tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post7625874834389480834..comments2024-10-25T13:58:36.797+01:00septicislehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03369157723084834549noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-62294220648113887052009-01-18T05:28:00.000+00:002009-01-18T05:28:00.000+00:00No, obviously not. I understand why they might want in secret, considering what's been leaked already and how the media have had a field day because one attractive young woman is accused of killing another, I was instead making the point that it's quite obvious that they're hurting enough as it is without the Mail deciding that the trial of her daughter's alleged killers isn't about her but rather the "Foxy Knoxy" show.septicislehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03369157723084834549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-20863275330387027012009-01-18T03:48:00.000+00:002009-01-18T03:48:00.000+00:00<I>despite Kercher's own parents' attempts to have the trial held behind closed doors</I><BR/><BR/>You seem to be implying here that trials in secret might (in any circumstances, ever) be a good thing. I hope that's a mistake rather than a policy decision.<BR/><BR/>Platell is revolting, incidentally. That's a bit like saying water is wet, but it's a point we all need to make from time to time.John Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17024263999778310292noreply@blogger.com