tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:06:28 +0000politicsSun-watchScum-watchConservative-Liberal Democrat coalitionDavid Cameronnon-politicsmiscellanymusicyoutube video postsmedia analysisabuses by tabloidsterrorGordon BrownConservativesforeign policydubstepcivil libertiesLabourjihadiststerrorismmedia coveragesecurity servicesmockeryNew LaboureconomicsDaily Mail-watchcrimebullshitLiberal DemocratsToriesbloggocksRupert MurdochEd MilibandSyriaGeorge OsborneIraqweekendweekend linksphone hackingweekend round-upal-QaidaNews of the WorldNick CleggimmigrationMail-watchdeath of Labourracismcrime policiesdrum and bassspending cutsIsrael-PalestinetortureNews InternationalIsraelLibyawelfare reformhypocrisyExpress-watchrenditionwar against bullshitMetropolitan policeMiddle East intifadaterror suspectsIraq disastermedia hysteriaHamastabloid analysisidiocyGazacuntsmedia reportingArab springDaily Mailtabloid stupidityAndy Coulsondark artstabloid mendacitybass musicfall of Gordon BrownprisonsIslamistsBBCMI5human rights actpersonal shitpost-dubstepBBC bashingMadeleine McCannTony Blairmoral panicspoliceRebekah Wadefootball2010 election campaignAfghanistanLeveson inquiryMI6Press Complaints Commissiongrimesocial networking websitescensorshiphousechurnalismGCHQJack StrawUnited States foreign policyMuslim bashingbenefit systemhiatusBritish MuslimsDavid MilibandIntelligence and Security CommitteeJacqui SmithscaremongeringBarack Obamapolicyasylum seekersjournalismsilly seasonGlenn MulcaireGrauniadcomplicity in torturefreedom of speechhuman rightsEuropean Unionchild abuseprotestsIslamic StateJames MurdochstupidityunemploymentLibyan no fly zoneNadine DorriesOlympicsVince CableWilliam Haguecelebrity culturedrug policiesdrugsfucking liarsHome OfficeNews CorporationRebekah BrooksTheresa Mayconference seasondrug prohibitionelection 2015links42 daysBaby PGaddafiJohn ReidUKIPlazy bloggingBlairitesGaza December 2008 raidsPaul DacreTwitterconstitutional reformeducationextraordinary renditionmonarchyterror lawsConservative party conferenceEuropean Court of Human RightsGaza blockadeIain Duncan SmithIranMPs expensesMelanie PhillipsMichael GovePalestinecriminal justice systemdeportationindieknife crimepornographyChris GraylingClive GoodmanHazel BlearsNigel Faragefisksthe new ToriesBNPBinyam MohamedFacebookMurdochSpaceUnited Statesarghliberal interventionismmigrantsobituariespolitical scandalsspintabloid hypocrisywar on drugswe're all doomed90 daysAbu QutadaBBC idiocyEd BallsJordanNewsnightRussiabroken society bullshitcynicismfilm reviewfilmsinjusticelegal threatslibelmiscarriages of justiceprivacyradicalisationrecessionthe budgetBSkyBBritish National PartyIain DaleIslamophobiaLondon riotsUS foreign policyby-electionscelebritiesfascistsleakstaxAbu QatadaBoris JohnsonCraig MurrayDavid DavisFree Syrian ArmyGuantanamoJean Charles de MenezesLabour leadership contest 2010LondonPakistanPrismSchillingsScotlandScottish National Partydrug stupidityelections 2015liquid bombs plotpaedophilia hysteriasensationalismsmearingworkfareAlisher UsmanovAlistair DarlingBaha MousaGlen JenveyMinistry of DefenceNick DaviesTERROR TARGET SUGARbroken societysportthe new BlairitesGuidoIslamic State of IraqMadeleine McCann bullshitRichard TimsStephen WhittamoreTemporaUmmah.comauthoritarianismconspiracy theoriesdatabasesemotional pornographyexpenseslaw 'n' ordermedia ownershipmusical terrorismneo-Nazisprivacy lawreligionsir ian blairBlair's legacyEgyptGrauniad bollocksNews of the ScrewsPrincess DianaSarah's lawabortioncontrol ordershow journalism worksimmigration policyintelligence agenciesjungleour new overlordspaedophile hysteriaprison reformpropagandatabloid junkAlan JohnsonBBFCFlat Earth NewsHelen NewloveJeremy HuntPeter MandelsonPrince HarryRichard Desmondausteritycannabiscomedycorruptioncrime figuresfeminismhardcoreliarsmoralitymusic industryonline jihadistspaedophiliaproportional representationracism rowstackling extremismyouth crime56 daysBirmingham terror raidsCrown Prosecution ServiceDaily ExpressEUIPCCLabour conferenceMazher MahmoodMcCannsNick GriffinPeter GibsonQueen's speechScottish independenceTimes-watchVladimir Putinchemical weaponsferal kids will kill us allinternet freedomloans for peeragesno compromise on 42 dayspolitical donationsroyal familysuicidetrollingAdvisory Council on the Misuse of DrugsArsenalBritish army abuseBulgaria-Romania accession to EUComment is FreeDNA databaseEastern European migrationEnglandGuardian-watchHouse of Lords reformIan TomlinsonJames PurnellLearco ChindamoMirror-watchMySpaceNHSPhil WoolasPolicy ExchangeRussell BrandSaudi ArabiaShannon MatthewsTelegraphbanks bailoutchristmasforeign affairsprison overcrowdingrefuge for Iraqisrocksexspecial relationship"Sachsgate"7/77/7 inquiryAlastair CampbellAlex SalmondAmy WinehouseAndrew LansleyAndrew MitchellAndy HaymanCharles ClarkeColin StaggDaily StarDaily Star-watchEU "constitution"FranceG20 protestsHarriet HarmanHouse of LordsIran captures sailorsJimmy SavileKen LivingstoneLabour deputy leadership contestLiam FoxMartin KettleMercury Music PrizeOfcomPeter ClarkePlebgatePolly ToynbeeUS presidential campaignUS presidential electionadvertisingalleged police brutalityapologisingautumn statementbinge drinkingcabinet reshufflechild protectionclimate changecompensationhistoryhorrorhung parliamentimmigration figuresinsurgencyironymadnessmandatory work activitymental ill-healthpolitcspolitical correctness gone mad bullshitquotessatiresexualisationsocial servicessocial workerstakfiriststax avoidance10p tax rate2013Abdelbaset al-MegrahiAmanda PlatellAndy BurnhamAnjem ChoudaryBad ScienceBenjamin NetanyahuBritish crime surveyEuropean Convention on Human RightsFIFAFrank FieldGazaUnderAttackGeoff HoonGlasgow airport attackGlenn GreenwaldHillary ClintonJames BulgerLockerbieLord GoldsmithMargaret ThatcherMark DugganMartyn GilleardMax MosleyOsama bin LadenPrivate EyeQuilliam FoundationRhys JonesRowan WilliamsSerious Fraud OfficeTim IrelandTom WatsonWindsor "Muslim yobs"anonymityarms dealscrime statisticsentrapmenthealthhomophobiainheritance taxlobbyinglocal elections aftermathprostitutionright-wing terrorismtvwading knee-deep through the internet sewerwork programme"new politics"2013 review2014 reviewBAe SystemsBahrainBarclaysCaroline Criado-PerezCharlie HebdoDamian GreenDavid MirandaDiane AbbottEU referendumEastleigh by-electionEd HusainEuropean electionsIDFJeremy PaxmanJohn KerryJohn McCainJohn TerryJonathan EvansKaren MatthewsKenneth ClarkeLiberal Democrat conferenceLondon Mayoral electionLouise MenschMaajid NawazNicola SturgeonNorthern IrelandRachel NickellRichard LittlejohnRobert MuratSarah PalinSpecial Immigration Appeals CommissionSunday TimesTalibanTelegraph-watchTottenhamTrevor KavanaghUK border agencyUS politicsUkraineWoolwich attackantisemitismbigotrybookschequebook whorescommentscredit crunchfascismfreedom of informationgun crimehacksidiotsinequalityintruding into griefmedia anaylsisobscenityprime minister's questionspublic opinionreality tvsexismtabloidstechnotrade unionsvoyeurismwider left"public interest"20 reasons for 20 weeks campaign4-MMC9/11Abdulla Ahmed AliAdam CurtisAl-Qaida in the Arabian PeninsulaAmerikkkaAnders BreivikAndrew SachsAnjem ChoudraryBarry GeorgeBig BrotherBlairite coupBush administrationCCTVChannel 4Chilcot inquiryChinaChurch of EnglandDenis MacShaneDominic GrieveElwyn WatkinsEurozoneFacebook bashingGarry NewloveGeorgiaGrauniad-watchID cardsITVIraq insurgencyIraq withdrawalIsrael boycottJade GoodyJahongir SidikovJeremy ClarksonJohn McDonnellJonathan RossJosef FritzlKen ClarkeLee RigbyLiam ByrneLibertyLondon 2012Lord LevyManhunt 2Melanie PhilipsMephedroneMing CampbellMubarakMySunNeil LewingtonNorway terror attacksOfstedOliver KammPatrick MercerPeter HainRussia-Georgia warSNPSuffolk murdersSun justiceTV reviewUS presidential candidatesUnited NationsUzbekistanWikileaksYvette Cooperalcoholanti-social behaviourcapital punishmentcentral London nail bombschild benefitcitizenshipdefence spendingdepressionfearhoaxesinhumanityinsanityjudgeslanguage abuseleaders' debateslegislationlicence feemulticulturalismniqabpage 3 idolparliamentpetitionspolitical correctnesspre-budget reportprivatisationrapereshufflesschool shootingssleazeso who do we vote for nowsocialism for the richspeechesspree killingsstatus quosuper-injunctionsverminwar crimes2009 review2012 reviewAV referendumAdeleAlfie PattenAllison PearsonAustriaBarri WhiteCIACatholicismChris HuhneChristmas politically correct bollocksDWPDamian McBrideDavid AbrahamsDavid LawsDiana inquestDispatchesEcstasyEliza Manningham-BullerFatahFox NewsGeoffrey DickensGeorgina BaillieHeathrowIranian presidential electionIslamismJohn YatesJoint Committee on Human RightsJon CruddasJon VenablesKelvin MacKenzieLabour arroganceLabour leadershipLiberal ConspiracyLinda BowmanLynton CrosbyMahmoud AhmadinejadMalcolm RifkindManchester April 2009 terror raidsMaria MillerMr Justice EadyNATONSAOccupy LondonOmar Bakri MohammadPanoramaRobert NapperRoy GreensladeSadiq KhanSara PayneSimon CowellSkySouth OssetiaSri LankaSteve BellSunny HundalTV fakery scandalsTabloid-watchTerence GavanUK UncutUmar Rabie al-KhalailaYarl's Woodal-Zawahiriapathyapologiesblame gamebuggingburying bad newschild detentionchild pornographycity academiesclassconspiracy theoristscultural Marxismcurrency unioncushy prisonsdefencediscriminationdrum & basseconomic downturnelection nightelectionsextraditionextreme pornographyfilm industryfloodsfunkygay rightsgrief industrygurkhashackeryheadlineshijacking of British Islamhome affairs select committeeinjunctionsintercept evidenceleaders' debatelistsmoronsmusic piracyoverreactingparliamentary expensespolice demandspolice statepress freedompress intrusionreverse ferretreviewsscrounger processingsecret courtssecurityseen elsewhereself-promotionsentencingsex offenderssharia lawshit tv programmesslow news dayssnobberysomeone fucking kill mespeculationspendingsycophancyveilsvotes for prisonerswe can't turn them awaywhitewashwingnuttery"mothers in arms"1302008 review2009 election campaign2010 review2011 review201421/7 bombers trialAbkhaziaAbu GhraibAbu HamzaAbu ZubaydahAdam WerrittyAfricaAlex FergusonAlexander LitvinenkoAlgeriaAmanda KnoxAriel SharonArsene WengerAzhar AhmedBAE slush fund inquiryBBC hypocrisyBPIBenazir BhuttoBetter TogetherBishop of RochesterBlair departureBloggerheadsBob AinsworthBob QuickBritish valuesCharles FalconerCherie BlairChristopher HitchensClaire PerryCrimeaCrown Prosection ServiceDaily MirrorDanny AlexanderDavid BlunkettDhiren BarotDiego GarciaEDLEU treaty referendumEdlington brothersEnoch PowellErol IncedalEvening StandardFaye TurneyFergus ShanahanFlorence and the MachineForest Gate terror raidFreddy PatelGCSEsGareth WilliamsGeorge GallowayGirls AloudGlastonburyGordon TaylorGreensHassan ButtHenry KissingerHouse of SaudINTERNET REVOLUTIONIan DavisonIan HuntleyInternet Watch FoundationIraq five years onIraq four years onIraq weekIraqi jihadJessica ValentiJohn HirstJohn PrescottJon GauntJulian AssangeKafeel AhmedKate MiddletonKate NashKaty PerryKeeleyKeith PedderKenny MacAskillKhalid Sheikh MohammadKobaniLabour party conferenceLily AllenLiverpoolLord AshcroftLord LamingLord NeubergerLord PhillipsLord StevensMaliMaria HutchingsMarina HydeMark KennedyMark Malloch BrownMark ThompsonMaxine CarrMikheil SaakashviliMitt RomneyMohamed Al-FayedMohamed FayedMoorfield estateMuslim Public Affairs CommitteeNeil WallisNew Labour valuesObscene Publications ActOwen JonesPatricia HewittPeaches GeldofPeter ObornePeter RipponPhilip Davies MPPrince CharlesRachel NorthRashid RaufRepublican presidental candidatesRepublicansRichard ThomasRobert Murat payoutRotherham abuse scandalRoyal Bank of ScotlandRuth FowlerRuth KellyRuth TurnerSaddam HusseinSamantha CameronShiraz MaherSimon DanczukSomaliaSri Lanka's Killing FieldsSt. Paul'sSun Lies blogSun on SundaySunny HurndalTamil TigersTescoTessa JowellThe Blair YearsTibetTim SpicerTimothy Garton AshTotal PoliticsTridentTrojan HorseTulisa ContostavlosUK National Defence AssociationUS military war crimes in IraqVideo Appeals CommitteeVirginia Tech massacreWall Street JournalWendi DengWilson doctrineaffront to justiceal-Jazeera memo trialassassinationsautonomicbiasblack deathbook reviewboycottsbreaking the cyclebudget-2012budget-2014budget-2015bullyingcablegatecausing offencechild povertyclass warcomplete and utter fuck-upcompulsory educationcontempt of courtcrime reportingcyber warfaredeath of Gaddafidemocracydirty bombsdiscodouble standardsdumbing downeconomic growthelectronicend of Labourfamily breakdownfraudgoatsegreedgutter pressgutter snipinghandover of powerignoranceilliberalismintegrationinvented scandalsjohnny foreignerlaw lordslocal elections 2007local elections 2008local elections 2013marriagemartyrdommea culpasmedia stupiditymisanthropynew medianews valuesnumber crunchingopinion pollspaparazziparliamentary reformpatriotismpessimismpolice and crime commissionerspolice reformpolice shootingspost-rockpseuds cornerquestions to which the answer is obviousreactingrealpolitikrevolutionsricinrule of lawscandalsschadenfreudesocial mobilitysort-it.co.ukspyingstreet of shamestrikesstudent tutition fee protestssupport our troopsswearingtax cutsterror manualsthe fourth estatetitan prisonstorture judicial inquiryuk garageunionsurban mythsvideoswarmongerswhy Boris wonwhy Ken lostyob culturezero tolerance"Suffolk ripper""al-Qaida in Britain""progressive"200920112011 election campaign20122012 PCC elections2020 Vision58 daysASBOsAVAbdul Muneem PatelAdele AdkinsAlan DershowitzAlan JohnstonAlan WestAlastair Campbell diariesAlex WestAlistar DarlingAndrew CunninghamAndrew DismoreAndrew ParkerAndy McNabAnne OwersAnthony MulhallAnwar_al-AwlakiArmyArunas RaulynaitisAryan Strike ForceAssociated NewspapersAwakening councilsAyman al-ZawahiriBBC deceptionsBBC injunctionBNP CrusadersBNP members listBT SportBabar AhmadBabar AhmedBailey reportBasraBen GoldacreBen GriffinBenefits StreetBig Brother racismBilal AbdullaBisher al-RawiBlair Middle EastBlair delusionBlogPower awardsBob DiamondBoston marathon bombingBradford prostitute murdersBrass EyeBritish Muslims and the paradox of multiculturalismBritish troop withdrawalBritsh Crime SurveyBrown should goBurma protestsCait ReillyCaroline FlintCaroline SpelmanChagossiansChampions LeagueCharles KennedyChed EvansChicken YogurtCho Seung-huiChris BryantClaudy bombingConservative manifestoConservativeHomeCraig SweeneyCressida DickCrewe by-electionDaniel JohnsonDarryn WalkerDavid AndersonDavid Lloyd Leisure CentreDavid NuttDean GodsonDemocrat presidental candidatesDenis MacEoinDerek DraperDes BrowneDominic MohanDonald PayneDouglas MurrayECHREMA protestsEcuadorEmma WestEnglish Defence LeagueEric PicklesErminegateEsther RantzenEuro 2012Exeter bomb explosionFalkland IslandsFallujahFelicity Jane LowdeFinsbury LimitedFiona MacKeownFrances LawrenceFree Gaza FlotillaFuture Jobs FundGDP figuresGabrielle GiffordsGary McKinnonGeneral MusharrafGeorge EntwistleGeorge MonbiotGermanyGordon Brown one year onGove levelsGraham DudmanGraham StringerGrant ShappsGrauniad hypocrisyGreeceGreen Lane mosqueHMS Albion speechHaltemprice by-electionHaringey councilHarry StanleyHeather MillsHizbullahHuman CentipedeI've never voted ToryIFSIPSAIRAIan EdmondsonIn AmenasIndependentIraq WMDIraq civil warIraq dossierIraqi civil warIraqi surgeIris RobinsonIshaq KanmiIslamic dressIsraeli embassyIvan CameronJack MonroeJackie AshleyJacqui JamesJames BlakeJames FoleyJan MoirJared LoughnerJill DandoJimmy MubengaJoanne LeeJobcentre PlusJohann HariJohanna KaschkeJohn HarrisJohn HuttonJohn KayJohn MajorJohn McTernanJohn RedwoodJonathan PowellJulian BrazierJulie BurchillKatia ZatuliveterKeith HyattKeith VazKen MacdonaldKerry NicolKlaxonsKoyair brothersLabour manifestoLabour relaunchLabour shadow cabinet electionLady MuccaLaila RezkLance PriceLehman BrothersLen McCluskeyLiberal Democrats manifestoLibor fixingLondon G20London Gaza protests 10/01/09London MayorLord CarlileLord GuthrieLord RennardLydia PlayfootMMR vaccineMPs pay riseMSM buying informationMadeleine BuntingMahzer MahmoodMail on SundayManic Street PreachersManningham-BullerMargaret HodgeMark AndrewsMark KearneyMark KermodeMark OliverMark RecklessMartin AmisMartin McGuinnessMichael FallonMichael Nazir-AliMike HancockMir Hossein MousaviMohammad Siddique KhanMohammed EmwaziMossadMuadh al-KasasbehMurder Set PiecesMurdoch sycophancyMuslim BrotherhoodMuslim Council of BritainMustaf JamaMy SunNSPCCNathaniel RothschildNeal LawsonNeil ClarkNew Generation NetworkNew StatesmanNicky DavisonNicky ReillyNicola RobertsNo One Written OffNorthern Ireland assemblyNorthern RockNorthumbria policeNudgeOleg DeripaskaOliver HarveyOlympic flame protestsOmar DeghayesOmar al-BaghdadiOperation Cast LeadOscarsPamela SomervilleParviz KhanPatarkatsishviliPaul BurrellPaul StainesPaula MurrayPeter BarronPeter FahyPeter FrancisPeter HitchensPeter TatchellPeter WattPhilip HammondPiers MorganPlane StupidPope BenedictPoppy fascismPresident BushPrevent reviewPrometheusQassam rocketsQatarQuentin LettsQuestion TimeRachel ManningRachel ReevesRaoul MoatRichard MurphyRichard WatsonRichey EdwardsRidley ScottRobert CoelloRobert CottageRobert HanniganRobert HoldingRomanian gangsRonald Thwaites QCRonnie BiggsRoshonara ChoudhryRosimeiri BoxallRough JusticeRoyal MailSS Experiment CampSabina MuellerSabrina HarmanSaffron revolutionSally Anne BowmanSally MurrerSalman RushdieSami al-SaadiSarah BrownSaville inquirySayeeda WarsiScorpionsShami ChakrabartiSharon BeshenivskyShiv MalikSilver Ring ThingSimon HarwoodSimone ClarkeSir William GageStandpoint magazineStephen ByersStephen GriffithsStephen LawrenceSteve LumbStormfrontSudanSunday ExpressSwedenTPIMsTUCTaxpayers' AllianceTen years of LabourTom BowerTom CroneTom StephensTommy RobinsonTommy SheridanToni ComerTony McNultyTrevor KavangahTrident replacementUS air strikesUS soldiersUndercover MosqueUnicef reportUniteUnityVirgin KillerVizWWIWikipediaWiltshire policeYates of the YardYemenZoe Williamsa-levelsal-Muhajirounallegiancealternative vote referendumanonymousarmed forcesask.fmassisted suicidebanality of evilbeheading plotbenefit fraudbest music of 2008best music of 2009best music of 2010best music of 2011best music of 2012best music of 2013best music of 2014big societyblog listsbreakstepbudget-2013burqabusinesscannabis potencycartoonschristmas booksclimate camp protestclueless Blairitescocainecold war reminiscingcomment policycomparisonsconflicts of interestcontemptcontractscontrol freakerycorrespondencedeathdeath of politicsdeathsdemocratic deficitdemonisationdigital rights managementdirect actiondistortiondrug useeditorial independenceelection feverelectoral reformemotional blackmaileuthanasiaexamsfappeningferal mediaflag flyingfuel dutyfunding scandalgangsgay marriagego home vansgreen politicsgun controlgypsieshalf-baked ideashomeopathyhumbugidiotic newspaper questionsimmgirationimmigrantsincompetenceinfightinginquiriesinsultsintoleranceivenevervotedtoryjubileejukejunk sciencelanguage of terrorleft alternativelettersliteraturelocal elections 2012making it upmedia analysis. Sun on Sundaymedia response to Suffolk killingsmid-term reviewmigrant workersmisogynymusic lyricsnew media bollocksnew politicsno platformnuclear powernuclear retentionobesityold schoolopen letterparty politicspatronising politicianspeace talkspersecution complexphotographyplagueplanningpoliticial kite-flyingpress regulationprison shipsprotecting childrenpublic relationsreligious craziesremakesresignationright to dieright to protestrulingssame old bullshitself-defencesex sellssexual violenceshit musicsmokingsmoking banspamspending reviewstraw mensuicide girlssurveillance statesus lawsswan eatersswear bloggingtabloid feudstax increasesteachingtediumtelevisionthe Investigatorthe far leftthe idiots are winningtop bloggingtraffickingtrancetranslation coststutition feesunderstanding radicalisationuniversal creditverbal pogromvictims' championvideo game censorshipvideo nastieswar criminalswest lothian questionwhere do we go from herewhistleblowersxenophobia"Michelle""Talibrum""blacking-up""cowardly""emotional literacy""exclusives""fuck off""gipsies""health in pregnancy""national service""no-go" areas"pixie dust""sex beasts""sex workers""tennis girls"#battlefornumber10#dearme#gamergate#twitterjoketrial'Towards Greater Understanding- Meeting the Needs of Muslim Pupils in State Schools'10 year plans1960s1960s values19842000s2007 review2010201524 hour drinking28 days3005 years of this shit50p tax rate80sA JourneyA4EAA GillACMDANPR camerasAQAATOS HealthcareATSC Exports LTDAaron RamsayAbbie HawkinsAbdul Hakim BelhajAbdul Sattar Abu ReeshaAbdul Waheed MajeedAbdulmutallabAbu Ayyub al-MasriAbu IzzadeenAbu Laith al-LibiAbu NimrAbu OmarAbu Yahya al-LibiAdam RegisAden Hashi AyroAdrian BeecroftAe SystemsAegisAfghan hijackersAfzal AminAhlus Sunnah wal JamaahAitken reportAl BanguraAl GoreAl-Sweady inquiryAlan ClarkAlan FinlaysonAlan HenningAlan MilburnAlastair DarlingAlberto KordaAlex WillcockAlistair BurtAll the Boys Love Mandy LaneAlternative Christmas MessageAma SumaniAmanda O'BrienAmen breakAmerican Family AssociationAmerican justiceAn Inconvenient TruthAnarchist CookbookAnbar Salvation CouncilAndrew BridgenAndrew KeenAndrew M. BrownAndrew MaloneAndrew RansleyAndrew WakefieldAndrew WalkerAndy GrayAngela McNabAngela MerkelAngela SmithAnn MaguireAnn WiddecombeAnnapolisAnne DarwinAnne-Marie SlaughterAnsar al-IslamAnthony GiddensAntichristArctic MonkeysArmy Rumour ServiceArthur BatchelorAssociated PressAtilla AhmetAudit CommissionAuschwitzAustrialian electionsBAABBC Have Your SayBBC ThreeBBC White seasonBBC fundingBPBaader-Meinhof groupBaitullah MehsudBarbara AmielBarnardo'sBaroness ScotlandBarry RubinBashar al-AssadBasil BrushBeau Bo D'OrBeboBell PottingerBen BroganBen KinsellaBeresfordsBernard ManningBeth EllisBherlin GildoBhopal disasterBig BrothelBill DeedesBilly Wright inquiryBitter LakeBlackadderBlackburn RoversBlair al-JazeeraBlair ice cream jugglingBlair media speechBlair multiculturalismBlair must goBlair press conferenceBlair resign petitionBlair's liesBloc PartyBloggerBlogs for BrownbackBloody SundayBlueprint for a green economyBob CrowBob PiperBobby FischerBodysnatchers of New YorkBoratBoris BerezovskyBoris BerzovskyBradford University fourBradford WestBradley ManningBramington shootingsBreakthrough BritainBrenda NamigaddeBrian FlynnBrian NelsonBridgendBrit awardsBritain's Got TalentBritish People's PartyBritish Social Attitudes surveyBritish jobs for British workersBritney SpearsBroadwater Farm riotsBrodie ClarkBrooke KinsellaBrooks NewmarkBruniBryan FischerBuilding Britain's FutureBurialBush 'n' BlairBush Saddam executionByron reportCD/DVD ripping in UKCJ_ChiversCageCalibreCameron sneeze boyCanon Michael AinsworthCapdownCardiff ThreeCardinal Cormac Murphy O'ConnorCardinal Keith O'BrienCarl BridgewaterCaroline HuntCarter-RuckCatherine BennettCentre for Open PoliticsChannel 4 NewsCharles MooreCharlie BrookerChe GuevaraCheryl McElroyChilcott inquiryChloe MadeleyChloe MarshallChloe SmithChris AmesChris ChacksfieldChris DillowChris MounseyChris PattenChristian InstituteChristian People's AllianceChristian VoiceChristian fundamentalistsChristians in ParliamentChristmas songsChristopher MyersChuck PalahniukCiFCivitasClaire RaynerClare BaldingClare ShortClarence MitchellCleveland PoliceCo-op BankColombiaCombat 18CommixCommunities and Government CommitteeCommunity Cohesion and MigrationCon CoughlinConnaught barracksConrad BlackConservative FutureContactPointCopenhagen attacksCopenhagen summitCordoba mosqueCosmo LandesmanCounter-Terrorism Act 2008Craig BellamyCraig OliverCreationist MuseumCrispin BluntCrossing BordersCtre of Social CohesionCudlipp lectureCumbria shootingsCurious Case of Benjamin ButtonCyril SmithDahiya doctrineDaily SportDamian HockneyDan EvansDan HodgesDaniel DaviesDaniel JamesDaniel PearlDaniel TaubDaniel TaylorDanielle LloydDanish embassy protestsDanny BoyleDanny DyerDavid AaronovitchDavid CairnsDavid ClarkDavid FreudDavid FrumDavid Ha'ivriDavid IrvingDavid JacksonDavid KeoghDavid LeighDavid MoyesDavid PoderisDavid ShawDavid ShaylerDavid WardDavid WillettsDavid WilsonDawn NeesomDebbie PurdyDebenhamsDecember 2010 terror raidsDelroy SmellieDemocratic UnionistsDemocratsDemosDenmarkDennis O'ConnorDeobandisDerek LambieDerek PasquillDerrick BirdDesmond de SilvaDfIDDiana AppleyardDiana boycottDiane LazarusDiary of the DeadDick MartyDigby JonesDigital BritainDignitasDominique Strauss-KahnDonal BlaneyDonald TrumpDoncaster prisonDonkey PunchDonna SummerDoug HoyleDouglas CarswellDow JonesDr DeathDr DementoDr Stuart NewtonDrew GoddardDrugs LiveDu'a Khalil AswadDuncan GoodhewDuncroftDylan JonesEU rendition reportEastEndersEasterEavesEd JaggerEduardoEdward TerryEdward TimpsonEli RothEllee SeymourElliot RodgerElmore LeonardEmdadur ChoudhuryEmily SanderEmily ThornberryEmma HarrisonEngaging Communities in Fighting CrimeEnglish votes for English lawsEric GarnerEric JoyceEthiopiaEuropeEuropean Union. EU treaty referendumEuropean elections 2014Euston ManifestoEvening StanardEveryday SexismEvil DeadEzekiel MaxwellF1FGMFIPsFabio CapelloFairytale of New YorkFatah al-IslamFather James ChesneyFede AlvarezFilth: The Mary Whitehouse StoryFinucane inquiryFive Chinese CrackersFoxy KnoxyFrancis MaudeFrancois HollandeFrank LuntzFrankie BoyleFrankie KnucklesFred GoodwinFreeing Britain to competeFrench state visitFukushimaG4SGareth ComptonGareth PeirceGary GlitterGbagboGeert WildersGeneral PetraeusGeorge A. RomeroGeorge BushGerald BattenGerald ScarfeGerry AdamsGil Scott-HeronGillian AndersonGillian DuffyGillian GibbonsGillian MooneyGiraffe restaurantGlasgow East by-electionGlasgow North EastGlenrothes by-electionGlyn TravisGodfrey BloomGodspeedGodwin's lawGordon Brown goes to WashingtonGowers reportGraham WildGrand Theft AutoGrauniad leakGreek riotsGreg DykeGreg MulhollandGrotesqueGus O'DonnellHIV/AidsHMVHSBCHack AttackHadley FreemanHamdania incidentHarmondsworthHarry ColeHarry HammondHarry RedknappHassan RouhaniHate on the StateHaut de la GarenneHealey primary schoolHeathrow third runwayHerman CainHicham YezzaHickeysHighgate cemeteryHilary BennHillsborough disasterHiroshimaHolloway prisonHolly BaxterHolocaust denialHostel Part IIHouse of CommonsHugh Cuddlipp lectureHugh GrantI Saw The DevilIMFINLAIOCIPFIITIan CobainIan GibsonIan KatzIan KerrIan PaisleyIftikhar Muhammad ChaudhryImad MughniyehImperial CollegeImran KhanIndependent Asylum CommissionIndian subcontinet floodsIndymediaInspireInterceptions of Communications reportIowa caucusIpswichIraq Study GroupIraq debateIraq inquiry voteIraq rutIraq. Iraq disasterIraqi prisoner abuseIrelandIreland says noIrfan RajaIsa MuazaIslam4UKIsrael-Hizbullah-Lebanon warIt Shouldn't Happen to a MuslimIt Was Alright in the 70sIvor Novello awardsIvory CoastJack DromeyJake SmithJalal SharafiJames AshleyJames BarkerJames McGrathJames SlackJamil HusseinJamil al-BannaJamil el-BannaJan BerryJan25Janet HossainJapanJason SmithJaycee Lee DugardJeanette WintersonJee-won KimJennifer LawrenceJennifer RubinJeremy BrowneJerry FalwellJerry Springer The OperaJessie JJill SawardJim KnightJimmy CarrJoanna YeatesJodie MarshJohn BercowJohn CarrJohn DenhamJohn EdwardsJohn GrishamJohn HigginsJohn Jodka IIIJohn LyonJohn RentoulJohn SentamuJohnny VaughanJon MendelsohnJon SnowJonathan LaidlawJonathan RutherfordJonny EvansJoss WhedonJoy DivisionJudea PearlJulie BindelJulie MoultJustice CommitteeJustin McKeatingJustin WelbyKalam familyKathy SykesKeir StarmerKelvin MacKenziesKen JonesKen RussellKenyaKenya election riotsKerry KatonaKevin GreeningKevin WhitrickKhalid KhaliqKiller JoeKim HowellsKing AbdullahKing Fahd schoolKirk ReidKirsan IlyumzhinovKit MalthouseKodjo YengaKosovoKristallnachtKurdistan Workers' PartyKurdsLCD SoundsystemLGBT rightsLabour leadership contest 2015Labour loyalistsLady CampbellLahore attacksLana VandenbergheLancet Iraq studyLansdowneLars VilksLashkar-e-TaibaLast House on the LeftLast.fmLatinLaura MichaelsLazardLeanne WoodLebanonLee SpievackLeila DeenLenin's TombLeo O'ConnorLeon WilsonLewis BLewis PageLiberal Defense of MurderLiberal Democrat leadership contestLibyan civil warLife magazineLin HomerLinda JackLindsey protestsLinkin ParkLionel ShriverLionheartLisbon treatyLoneLook magazineLord BellLord BoyceLord CareyLord CarterLord DraysonLord FreudLord HopeLord IngeLord OakeshottLord RobertsonLord TaylorLord TruscottLord WoolfLords Select Committee on Economic AffairsLords communications committeeLords reformLorraine KellyLouise CaseyLouise PerrettLove ItLucian FreudLuciana BergerLuis SuarezLulzSecLuton army protestsLynn ElsonLynndie EnglandMAPPAMDMAMH17MPACUKMacTaggart lectureMadeleine McCann bullshiStMagna CartaMahdi armyMahmoud AbbasMahmoud al-MabhouhMahmudiyah incidentMajid AhmedManal OmarManchester UnitedManic Streets PreachersMapsMarc WadsworthMarch 09 NI shootingsMare NostrumMark BrungerMark ClarkeMark FranchettiMark HarperMark HughesMark PritchardMark RonsonMark ScogginsMartin O'NeillMartin RowsonMartyrsMary WhitehouseMatt BendorisMatt DriscollMatthew ElliottMatthew NormanMatthew SwiftMatthew TaylorMatthew WoodsMatthew d'AnconaMatty HullMaud LennardMavi MarmaraMax CliffordMax GogartyMedia 100Megan's lawMeltem AvcilMental Health Advisory TeamMeredith KercherMetroMexicoMichael AncramMichael FootMichael GradeMichael HowardMichael JacksonMichael MastromarinoMichael RidleyMichael StoneMichael ToddMichael WhiteMichael WoodMichelle MalkinMick CreedonMick PhilpottMiddle EnglandMigration WatchMigrationWatchMikaMike FullerMike HuckabeeMike JacksonMike SteeleMike SullivanMilitary Studies in the Jihad Against the TyrantsMillennium domeMinistry of JusticeMinistry of TruthMinnesota bridge collapseMoD pyschicsMoazzam BeggMogwaiMohammad HamidMohammed AshaMohammed Junaid BabarMohammed KendehMonica GrenfellMoqtada al-SadrMorgan TsvangiariMorning StarMothers' UnionMr Justice BeanMr Justice WeirMuktah IbrahimMunir HussainMuslims 4 KenMuslims Against CrusadesMuslims under SiegeMyDeathSpace.comNatalie BennettNatwest ThreeNawaz SharifNedaNeda Agha-SoltanNeil DoyleNeil KinnockNeil MurrayNell FrizzellNetanyahuNetwork RailNew HumanistNew Labour. changesNew PartyNew York PostNew York crime figuresNew YorkerNewark by-electionNewswatchNicholas HagueNick BucklesNick CohenNick RobinsonNicky JacobsNicky MorganNicola BenedettiNicola FisherNicolas SarkozyNigel EvansNigel HastilowNigel SheinwaldNight SlugsNightJackNisha Patel-NasriNorman BakerNorman BettisonNorman FinkelsteinNorman MailerNorth KoreaNorth Sea oilNorwich North 2009 by-electionNuala O'LoanOECD forecastOUTRAGEObserverOffice of Budget ResponsibilityOfficial Secrets ActOiNKOldham East and Saddleworth by-electionOliver LetwinOlympic logoOmagh bombingOmar KhayamOmar KhyamOne DirectionOpen Rights GroupOperation Ark RoyalOperation BullfinchOperation CreviceOranginaOwen PatersonOxford UnionOxfordshire groomingPC Keith BlakelockPCCPCSPKKPMQsPaddy AshdownPaedophile Information ExchangePalestine papersPalestinian "civil war"Palestinian electionsPalestinian human shieldsPaolo Di CanioParalympicsParameswaran SubramanyamParis BrownParis HiltonParliamentary Resources UnitPat FinucanePat MooneyPatrice EvraPatricia TierneyPaul BrittonPaul ChambersPaul FlowersPaul FlynnPaul GogartyPaul McMullanPaul OestreicherPaul RaymondPaul StephensonPaul TibbetsPaul WhitehousePavlo LapshynPete DohertyPeter BaconPeter BuckroydPeter CruddasPeter HillPeter SutcliffePeter TaylorPeter TriggerPeter WoodhamsPeterboroughPhilip ZimbardoPhillip DaviesPhilpott casePhormPierre GemayelPlain English CampaignPole-bashingPolice FederationPollard reportPoppy projectPower of NightmaresPremier LeaguePrince BandarPrince FaisalPrivate Eye rip-offsProfessor Paul GreggProgressive Policy ForumPruw BoswellPublic Services Improvement Policy GroupPublic and Commercial Services UnionPyramid PostersQ AwardsQinteQQuentin DaviesRBSRIPARMTRUSIRachel WardRadio 1Radio 1 Establiished 1967Raed SalahRamadanmanRamzi MohammedRangzieb AhmedRatbiterRay LewisRaymond HorneRaymond ScottReal IRARecess MonkeyRed Army FactionReg BaileyRehka Kumari-BakerRemembrance SundayRespectRevelationRhiannon Lucy CosslettRhodri DaviesRichard BarnbrookRichard BransonRichard BrunstromRichard CasebyRichard DannattRichard DearloveRichard ScudamoreRichard SeymourRichard ThalerRichard TimneyRick PerryRiyadh ul HaqRizwaan SabirRobbie KeaneRobert MugabeRobin WilliamsRochester by-electionRock Against RacismRoger AltonRolf HarrisRomaRon PaulRon ProsorRon SuskindRonald ReaganRonnie FlanaganRoss McKnightRoy HattersleyRoyal British LegionRuksana BegumRussian diplomat expulsionRussian fascists beheadingRyan ClearlyRyan FlorenceSASSDSSIACSSRIsSaddam executionSafiyah JonesSajid JavidSally ClarkSally MorganSamina MalikSarah CampbellSarah WollastonSarfraz ManzoorSarkozySatanic VersesSaudi royal visitSayyid QutbScarlett KeelingSchilingsScientologyScientology is a cultScotland YardScouting for GirlsScum-wathSean HodgsonSean HoeySean MercerSecurity and Liberty can be protected speechSepp BlatterSeumas MilneSex and the City 2Shaker AamerShamelessShan OakesSharon ShoesmithSheffieldSheffield StarSheffield incest caseSheikh Ibrahim MograShilpa ShettyShitmatSimon HattenstoneSimon HefferSimon HoggartSimon TisdallSimon WalshSinjar bombingsSinn FeinSiobhain ButterworthSiobhain McDonaghSir Christopher RoseSir John SawersSir Paul StephensonSir Peter VardySir Thayne ForbesSkreamSky ITV share purchaseSmith InstituteSnuffSochiSocial Justice Policy GroupSocialist Equality PartySocialist Workers' PartySon of Star WarsSony Pictures hackSophie LancasterSoumaya GhannoushiSousse attackSouth Yorkshire PoliceSpike MilliganSpiked OnlineSpooksSri Lankan cricket team attackStacy BeerStalin HoodStan CollymoreStella CreasyStephen CarterStephen GatelyStephen GoughStephen GreenStephen GreyStephen HesterStephen PoliakoffStephen TimmsSteve CooganSteve DoughtySteve HiltonSteve MesshamStockwell OneStraightheadsStuart CampbellStuart DimmockStuart MacLennanSue ReidSue TurtonSuhartoSun backs BrownSunderlandSusan CollinsSussex policeSuzanne MooreSweeney ToddSwinton ThomasSwitzerlandSylvia HenrySylvia LancasterTaimour Abdulwahab al-AbdalyTaj HargeyTalbot Street bomb-making haulTalksportTamsin DunwoodyTanya ByronTarique GhaffurTatler 10Teaching Emotive and Controversial HistoryTerrorism Act 2008Tesco jailsThames Valley policeThe ApprenticeThe AristocratsThe Baader-Meinhof ComplexThe Bunny GameThe Cabin in the WoodsThe Catholic Orangemen of TogoThe CoralThe DevilsThe Holy BibleThe London PaperThe PoguesThe Thick of ItThe WireTheresa WintersThinking bloggersThomas FriedmanThomas Lund-LackThree Little Cowboy BuildersTiger TigerTim KretschmerTim LoughtonTim SpantonTina BrownTinkebellToday programmeTom DaleyTom DribergTom EastonTom HarrisTom PalmerTom ap Rhys PryceTony BennTony HallTony ParsonsTower HamletsTrafiguraTransport Security Measures: Sniffer Dogs TrialsTrevor PhillipsTrig-trutherismTrimTunisiaTurkeyUAEUCU boycottUFOsUK Drug Policy CommissionUK-US response to Gemayel's assassinationUNUN rights of the childUNCRCUS presidental primariesUlrika JonssonUnspeakV/H/SValentine's DayVanessa PerroncelVenezuelaVicky PryceVikram DoddVirgin MediaVoodoo HistoriesWakefield prisonWalid SalemWanless reviewWarren BlackwellWayne HemingwayWayne RooneyWe Need to Talk About KevinWendy AlexanderWes CravenWest Midlands policeWestboro Baptist ChurchWestern civilisationWestfieldWilfred BurchettWilliam CornickWilliam FriedkinWilliam Rees-MoggWimbledon ballsWings Over ScotlandWinnie JohnsonWoman EWoodhill buggingWorld Cup 2010World Health Organisation Iraq studyWorld Press Freedom DayWorst music of 2006Yaron LondonYasmin Alibhai-BrownYassin NassariYassin OmarYezidisYossi AlpherYoung Mujahideen MovementYvonne RentonZavviZimbabweZoey Zanea year onabuse by tabloidsad-hominemadapting to protestal-Askari shrineal-Shabaabalternative medicineanarchy in the UKanother world is possibleanti-depressantsanti-fascistsanti-racismanti-war leftaspirationasylum seekrsatheismatomisationattitudes to the youngattorney generalback soonbad tastebailiffsbaltimorebankstersbansturbationbears shit in the woodsbedroom taxbeheadingsbest albums of 2006best albums of 2007best albums of 2008best albums of 2009best albums of 2010best albums of 2011best albums of 2012best albums of 2013best albums of 2014best music of 2007bill of rightsbiographiesblasphemyblogrollblogswarmbody countsbolus of wankersbountybread and circusesbriberybritishoppression.combroadbandbudget-2011building on progressbureaucracycabinet minutescalendarscaption competitioncargo bomb plotcarrots and stickscharactercharity shopschatroomschild benefit databasechild sexual exploitationchild warfarechildhood wellbeingchildren's commissionerschoicechutzpahcitizenship: our current bondclass struggleclichescoincidencescollusioncolumnistscoming disasterscomment moderationcommentariatcommunalismconstitutional renewal billconsultanciesconsultationconsumerismcopyright protectioncorporal punishmentcouncil housingcouragecreationismcricketcrime crisiscrucifix-shaped dildosculturecushy lifecyncismdeath of social democracydebtdeja-vudemocracy task forcedevolutiondictatorshipsdigital economy billdiplomacydo we want Labour to win?dowsing rodsdraconian crackdownsdraft queen's speechdreadful writing cornerdrink drivingdrug studiesdumped IVF twinsdyslexiae-jihadistsearly releaseeducation for Africaelectronicaemergency ruleemoend of Blairismend of the partyendorsementsenergy efficencyenvironmentequality of opportunityeuphemismsexcusesexpectationsexplicit imagesfailed opportunitiesfaith healingfashionfaux concernfavourite booksfellatiofemale sucide bombersfetishismfiascosfile-sharingfindmadeleine.comfirst weekfirst world war anniversaryfood banksfootball takeoversforest sell offforestsforgeriesforgivenessforum raidsfranchisesfree schoolsfree speechfreedomfriendly fire tapefruity lady comes to townfuck-upsfuel panicfuture garagefwdgaragegay rape horrorgeneralisationsgenocidal tyrantgerrymanderinggesture politicsghostplane.netgimmicksgirl with a one track mindgovernment of all talentsgraffatigrievanceshappiness indexhard labourhatchet jobshate campaignsheadscarveshell on earthheroesheroin payouthijabholiday campshome office reformhome secretarieshonours systemhorrendous tackleshouse price idiocyhousinghttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifBBFChypeidealismidentity politicsillegal copyingilltreatmentimperialimperial hubrisin praise ofinconsequential bullshitinconsistencyindividualisminquestsintegrityintellectualsintelligence servicesinterceptsinterwebirrationalityjoined-up governmentjudicial reviewjust fancy thatkhatkidnappingkill mekilling fieldknuckledraggerslabellinglads magslanguage course cutslazinessleechingletter bombslife goes onlive bloglives are at risklocal elections 2009local elections 2014local newslonelinesslookalikeslyrical terroristmanagement-speakmanifestosmarch for the alternativemarginalisation of Christianitymarginalsmassacresmediamedia covergaemedia reporting. media analysismemesmetricmiddle classmilitary spendingminaretsmindfulnessminers compensationminimum wagemistakesmob mentalitymodestymoral decaymoral high groundmost disappointing music of 2007most disappointing music of 2008murder pornmurdered prostitutesnaked ramblernaming and shamingnanny statenarrativenational intelligence estimatenationalisationnativity playsnativity scenesndrew Cunninghamneo-conservativesnepotismnever have so many owed so little to so fewno November electionno alternativenovelsnutjobsoilonline vigilantesopen prison escapesoptimismorgan donationour shared futureout with a whimper not a bangovercrowdingpage 3parallel universeparliamentary Labour partypassive aggressionpaternalismpatronising the publicpay risespedantismpeer to peerpensionspersonal is politicalpetrol pricephone vote controversyphony toughnessplacebo effectplaying the victimpoetic justicepoetrypointless popularity contestspolitical disengagementpolitical fortunespolitical gimmickspolitical holidayspolitical manuveringpolitics. George Osbornepolticspope catholicpornificationpost-punkpre-detention without chargepredictionsprejudicepress releasesprison officers strikeprivate detectivesprivate health centresprivate schoolingprivilege checkingpro-war leftprobation privatisationprogressprojectionspsychiatrypublic schoolingpublishingqatquangosradical feminismrailwaysrandom factsranting badly to myself in the middle of the nightrationalisationraverebalancing cjsrefugeesrehabilitationrejoin Labour?reminiscingrenditonrequired readingresistance groupsreverse narrativerevisionismrights and responsibilitiesriotingrise of the idiotsrivers of bloodrobin hood in reverserole modelssection 76self-employmentself-harmself-indulgenceseminary massacresending messagesseparation of powerssepticisle elsewheresex educationsexual harassmentshared valuesshark bullshitshitshooting fish in barrelsskunkslaverysloganssniffer dogs offend muslimssnow photographssocial contractssocial housingsocial media analysissocialist leftsock-puppetssofa governmentsomething is wrong on the internetsomething stinkssopcasourcessouth London shootingsspeakersporadic updatesstamp duty holidaystereotypesstorms in teacupsstraw manstudent tuition fee protestsstupid namessupercasinossupermarketssurvelliance stateswivel-eyed loonstaserstax creditsteaching to the testteddy bear Muhammad nonsenseteenage murdersteenage pregancyterrible lyricsterror gangs could go freeterror. al-Qaidaterrorist threatterrorist training paintballingterrrorismthe Milliesthe children's planthe end of Blairismthe new Blairites. schoolsthings I know nothing aboutthinking out loudthird sectorthought crimetimiditytolerancetop 500 political blogstorture-porntranscending politicstransfer deadline daytransphobiatroops out of Iraqtrusttruth and reconcilliationtuition feestwat-o-tronu-turnsuk bassultra-richunderage drinkingunderdogsunderpants bomberuniform rowunite and fightuseless quizzesvalues dayvanityverbiosityveteransvindictivenessvoicemail hackingvolunteeringwarwar against somethingwar logswar on somethingwater cannonwaterboardingweapons of mass destructionwestminster protest banwhat price privacywhole life termswitch-huntswitless blogsworst music of 2007worst music of 2008worst music of 2009worst music of 2010worst music of 2011worst music of 2012worst music of 2013worst music of 2014yob brushyoung peopleyouth crime action planObsoleteSelf-destructive dickish leftism from who knows where. || "It is now less and less necessary for the writer to invent the fictional content of his novel. The fiction is already there. The writer's task is to invent the reality." -- JG Ballard. || "In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion.... To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples." -- Valerie Solanas.http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.com (septicisle)Blogger3795125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-3157688064685569340Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:41:00 +00002015-07-07T20:42:44.877+01:007/7foreign policyIraqIslamic Statemedia analysispoliticsSyriaterrorismThe banality of grief.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">At times, it's interesting to note just what gets reported widely and what doesn't.&nbsp; At the weekend, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-33397305">the BBC went fairly big on the release of a video</a> from Islamic State apparently showing the execution of a group of Syrian soldiers in the ancient amphitheatre of Palmyra. The response from Syria's head on antiquities to a previous execution in the amphitheatre had been to stress how using "the Roman theatre to execute people proves that these people are against humanity".&nbsp; I'll let you, dear reader, work through the various shades of irony contained in that short of a statement.<br /><br />Reported to a far lesser extent was a video released by Islamic State at the end of last month. &nbsp; This consisted of not one, not two, but three separate executions of men from the city of Mosul in Iraq, accused in the video of being spies for the government.&nbsp; Attired in those orange jumpsuits that were originally meant to point to the injustice of the extrajudicial detention by the United States of alleged terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, individuals from these groups of men confessed to their "crime" on camera.&nbsp; The first group were led to a car in a desert wasteland and chained together inside, unable to escape.&nbsp; A masked man then fired a rocket propelled grenade at his unmissable target.&nbsp; The second group were chained together inside a cage, similar to the one the Jordanian pilot was burned to death in.&nbsp; This time, the cage was slowly lowered by crane into a swimming pool, as cameras underneath the water filmed the men struggling desperately for life.&nbsp; The third group were led into an area of similar desert to where the first execution was carried out, and told to kneel.&nbsp; Explosives were then daisy-chained around their necks.&nbsp; The charges detonated, all but one of the men were decapitated, their heads flying in the direction of the camera.<br /><br />Recording the committing of atrocities for both propaganda and terroristic purposes is not of course new.&nbsp; Islamic extremists have been doing so since the early 90s, and Mexican drug cartels took up the practice more recently; Hitler had the prolonged, agonising execution by hanging with piano wire of some of those involved in the von Stauffenberg plot filmed.&nbsp; Islamic State has however taken it to a whole new level; beheadings and shots to the back of the head have been relegated in favour of <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=2&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0CCgQFjAB&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.haaretz.com%2Fnews%2Fmiddle-east%2F1.634358&amp;ei=4hycVb7IGYKesgHzjajAAg&amp;usg=AFQjCNG0l_E2bY30OYB39etbKsKqXhF9Zg&amp;sig2=VNM7qAXycYjfupcxgvT9AQ">asking followers on social media for ideas on how to kill those</a> whom have fallen into their clutches.&nbsp; Whether the practice is in fact counter-productive is difficult to weigh: certainly anyone who isn't a conservative Sunni knows full well what possibly awaits them should IS continue their march in both Syria and Iraq.&nbsp; It might further encourage those determined to resist to do so until the very end; alternatively, as we saw in Mosul itself, many will choose instead to flee at the first sign of an attack.<br /><br />Why the Mosul video wasn't as widely reported as others we can but guess at.&nbsp; There are only so many depictions of man's inhumanity to man that audiences can stomach in a short period, without either switching off in disgust or becoming desensitised to it.&nbsp; Reporting of conflicts other than Israel/Palestine which we ourselves have little or no apparent stake in is often fragmentary at best, especially when budgets continue to decline and insurance premiums correspondingly increase; the war in Yemen, despite being an extension of the proxy war being fought in Syria between Saudia Arabia, Qatar and others against Iran has been practically ignored.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/06/air-strike-hits-marketplace-aden-yemen"> Massacres via Saudi airstrike like yesterday's</a> are barely remarked upon.&nbsp; Alternatively, it's also the case we long stopped caring about the people of Iraq, who have suffered through 25 years of various Western interventions, to which can be added another 10 if you include the initial support given to Saddam's war against Iran.<br /><br />Today we remembered the horror of 7/7.&nbsp; For me, at least, what followed cannot properly be separated from that day, and some of the statements from politicians and also members of the public smack frankly of either faulty memories or outright revisionism.&nbsp; Perhaps the closest to the reality came from the then 14-year-old Emma Craig, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/07/uk-comes-to-standstill-as-it-marks-10-years-since-77-attacks">who survived the Aldgate bomb</a>: "Quite often people say 'It didn't break us, terrorism won't break us'. The fact is, it may not have broken London, but it did break some of us."&nbsp; It's certainly <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33407554">nearer the truth than the fantasy vision some have conjured</a> up or want there to be of this rainbow city, together grieving in solidarity, coming out stronger, "an international crossroads of diversity and ingenuity, tolerance and respect, challenge and opportunity."<br /><br />Like it or not, fear pervaded London for quite some time, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/07/7-july-london-bombings-muslim-victims">as did suspicion if not outright questioning</a>, even loathing of ordinary Muslims going about their business.&nbsp; Most of that fear was real and palpable; some of it was encouraged by a media that decided an attack had been inevitable, and by politicians who were ready to respond to it in the most inflammatory way they could.&nbsp; <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2007/11/guilty-verdict-but-still-no-justice.html">An entirely innocent man lost his life as a result</a> not just of the fear and paranoia the attack and then subsequent failed attack engendered, but also due to the incompetence and unaccountability of the Met, defended by all sides regardless of their failings.&nbsp; Tony Blair declared the rules of the game had changed, and launched straight into trying to detain "terrorist suspects" for up to three months, amongst other reforms that diluted hard-won freedoms and liberties.&nbsp; Blair's worst instincts about the threat were expanded upon by the previous government, which now requires nurseries to ensure children of pre-school age are not being radicalised.&nbsp; The security services that fail, as they always have and always will to prevent attacks despite having previous knowledge of the perpetrators, continue to demand ever increasing powers while insisting that the threat is as high, if not higher than ever.<br /><br />The awful truth is that ever since 9/11 the wrong targets have been chosen for the response.&nbsp; Rather than confront the sources of extremist Salafi Islam in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, something that would have required a complete change of mindset and allies, groups rather than the ideology was gone after.&nbsp; You cannot destroy an ideology, but you can cut off its funding and affect how it is spread.&nbsp; Little to no attempt was made to do so.&nbsp; Al-Qaida has without doubt a been decimated, and poses little threat, but in doing so something worse has been established, thanks entirely to western intervention.&nbsp; Islamic State owes its existence to the Iraq war, to the refusal to get tough with the Saudis over their double standards.&nbsp; <a href="https://www.iraqbodycount.org/">Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, if not more</a>, have died violently since 2003.&nbsp; Iraq would be little more than a country of memorials if every death as a result of terrorist attack, death squads or at the hands of the occupation forces was marked in the same way as the victims of the 7/7 attacks were commemorated.&nbsp; I am not, I stress, saying there is an equivalence here.&nbsp; There is not.&nbsp; I do not believe, as some, that 7/7 would not have happened had it not been for the Iraq war.&nbsp; Foreign policy is an excuse, not a reason.&nbsp; It was however an influence, and remains one.&nbsp; To not recognise our foreign policy since 9/11 has been a disaster and continues to help, rather than hinder the extremists, is at this point to be wilfully blind.<br /><br />It's come to something when of all people, Bob Quick, with his suggestion of letting <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/06/robert-quick-counter-terror-uk-charter-flights-syria-jihadis">those who want to join Islamic State do so</a> but effectively revoke their citizenship at the same time is the person closest to talking something approaching sense.&nbsp; For all the scaremongering of recent months, of an attack being a matter of time, all highly reminiscent of what came after 7/7 and the other foiled plots, few have questioned that Islamic State's real fight at the moment is not to attack the west, although it will go after soft targets such as in Tunisia, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/07/london-bombings-new-era-terror-uk-did-not-materialise-mi5-mi6-gchq">but to build on its lightning success of last year</a> and attract supporters.&nbsp; The big fear, of those who have fought in Syria returning and carrying out attacks, is exaggerated massively.&nbsp; We know this because those who return, or have returned, are thought of negatively.&nbsp; The caliphate is here, it's real, and the battle is to maintain it.&nbsp; Returning the world of the unbelievers is a personal failure.&nbsp; By contrast, not letting those who want to go do so, even as we are baffled about why anyone would want to, runs the risk of the lone attacks now so dreaded.<br /><br />Perhaps my opinion has always been shaded by how 10 years ago I didn't have any friends or past acquaintances living in London.&nbsp; 10 years on, I most assuredly do.&nbsp; Helping to prevent terrorism is everyone's responsibility.&nbsp; A decade on, it's hard to see precisely what's been achieved, whether we truly are stronger as a nation, more equipped to deal with the fallout if there was another mass casualty attack.&nbsp; It certainly doesn't feel like it.&nbsp; Our foreign policy makes just as little, if not less sense, than it did then.&nbsp; We are it seems yet again reduced to gestures, to platitudes, to asking why when the answers are within our grasp should we choose to reach for them.&nbsp; But by all means, #walktogether if it means something to you.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/07/at-times-its-interesting-to-note-just.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-5803218065646298540Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:38:00 +00002015-07-06T21:40:41.745+01:00BBCBBC idiocybudget-2015ConservativesGeorge Osbornelicence feemedia analysisTony HallThe beginning of the end.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Deals made in secret are always bad deals.&nbsp; It's not always instantly apparent which side has come out the loser, but in the instance of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33414693">the BBC versus a Conservative government</a>, anyone betting on the side of the public service broadcaster is on a hiding to nothing.<br /><br />Those with long memories might recall this is almost precisely what happened 5 years ago.&nbsp; Back then,<a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2010/09/slow-start-to-death-of-bbc.html"> at least Mark Thompson talked a good game</a> ahead of conceding pretty much everything: a pound out of the commissioning budget of the BBC is a pound out of the UK creative economy, he said in his MacTaggart lecture.&nbsp; Lecture delivered, the then director general accepted a freeze on <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2010/10/not-so-slow-death-of-bbc.html">the licence fee right up until 2016/17</a> without anyone else being consulted.&nbsp; In retrospect, thanks more than anything to the world finally noticing that phone hacking had been a thing, kiboshing News Corporation's dreams of swallowing Sky wholesale, it wasn't the worst of deals.&nbsp; Yes, there have been cuts, but the BBC is pretty much doing what it did in 2010, if not frankly better.<br /><br />To repeat the process, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/06/bbc-pay-cost-free-tv-licences-over-75s-fee-deal">as DG Tony Hall now has</a>, was asking for it.&nbsp; Rather than beating his chest ala Thompson, he instead decided he would show the Tories the wounds on his back.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/02/bbc-cut-more-1000-jobs-cost-saving-push">Look how I've already been flagellating myself</a>, he said, thinking that making clear how another 1,000 jobs will have to go thanks to the loophole allowing those who only use the iPlayer to watch catch-up TV don't have to pay the licence fee, a shortfall estimated to be costing £150m, would go some way to sate the Tory lust for blood.&nbsp; Schoolboy error.<br /><br />In some ways, to be sure, the deal Hall has struck doesn't look too bad for the BBC.&nbsp; It obviously secures the licence fee itself, although no one was seriously imagining the Tories would destroy the BBC in one fall swoop.&nbsp; The fee will also rise in line with inflation from 2017, although if inflation remains around zero as it is currently then it won't count for much.&nbsp; Hall's biggest coup, the one he's going to be boasting about, is reaching an agreement to close the above loophole, although how this will be done in practice remains to be seen.&nbsp; Hall has decided to describe this as "modernising" the licence fee, which seems an odd way of telling people to cough up, like it or not, but he obviously knows what he's doing.<br /><br />Otherwise he wouldn't have apparently, if we're to believe the reporting so far, suggested to the government that the BBC pick up the tab for free licence fees for the over-75s.&nbsp; This at present costs a mindboggling £650m.&nbsp; The licence fee brings in £3.72bn.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33332280/everything-you-need-to-know-about-bbc-threes-move-online">Moving BBC Three online only</a>, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jun/30/bbc3-set-to-go-online-only-as-trust-backs-plans-to-scrap-tv-channel">as approved by the BBC Trust</a>, is meant to save just £30m.&nbsp; Yes, there are a few other sweeteners in the deal, such as how the licence fee will no longer be "top-sliced" to pay for the roll-out of super fast broadband, that the cost will be phased in so the BBC doesn't lose £650m in one go, and how the corporation will effectively take control of the policy once its pays for it fully, leaving open the possibility Auntie will swiftly say that in fact the over-75s get a pretty good deal all told and either abolish the subsidy entirely, means test it or say only cover half, but you don't have to be Martin Lawrence to think the sums aren't going to add up.&nbsp; Not least when the way is still open for the decriminalising of non-payment, leaving it as only a civil offence, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-31151821">estimated at potentially costing the BBC a further £200m</a>.<br /><br />Let's start with the assumption that the deal leaves the BBC down by "only" £100m.&nbsp; Radio 4, according to the BBC, costs £91m a year (<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/06/george-osborne-bbc-raid-licence-fees-over-75s">the Graun says £121m</a>), while the BBC's online services writ large cost £174m.&nbsp; Whichever way the BBC tries to save that £100m, services are going to have to close.&nbsp; BBC Three might be shut down entirely, BBC Four could join BBC Three online only, some if not most of the BBC's local radio stations would go, and the digital radio offerings like 6 Music would almost certainly have to be looked at again.&nbsp; That's just on the assumption it costs £100m, when it could easily be far higher, especially if once fully phased in the BBC doesn't feel able to dump or cut the subsidy, a move the likes of George Osborne know full well will be opposed with the utmost vehemence by the rest of the media.<br /><br />According to Steve Hewlett, usually well informed, having to take on the cost of licence fees for the over-75s would have <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/05/bbc-cuts-job-losses-revenue-shortfall">"heralded a catastrophe"</a>.&nbsp; Tony Hall presumably believes the concessions he wrangled from both Osborne and new culture secretary John Whittingdale have avoided such a scenario.&nbsp; Again, let's take his word for it and accept in the circumstances he couldn't have done much better.&nbsp; That doesn't alter the fact this is the second time the BBC has been forced into cutting a deal without so much as the slightest input from the people whom actually pay for the damn thing.&nbsp; We apparently have no say whatsoever, unless the Tory majority is taken as being an affirmation for their manifesto promises of keeping the over-75s subsidy and err, a continuing freeze in the licence fee.<br /><br />It's difficult, if not impossible to separate this fait accompli from the behaviour of both the Tories and the majority of the press at large both during and since the election.&nbsp; David Cameron was almost certainly joking <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jun/21/nick-robinson-cameron-threatened-close-down-bbc-election-bus">when he said about closing the BBC down</a>, but the claims of bias made against the corporation during the campaign, utterly laughable considering how day after day the bulletins ran with the SNP-Labour pact scaremongering, were deadly serious.&nbsp; The Murdoch press, no longer cowed as memory of phone hacking fades and attention turns to the Mirror, <a href="http://leftfootforward.org/2015/05/murdoch-owned-times-attacks-bbc-for-media-empire-monopoly/">has been making its voice heard again</a>.&nbsp; Osborne's ridiculous comments yesterday that the BBC was somehow crowding out not just local, but national newspapers, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jun/18/telegraph-website-wins-battle-election-readers">Mail Online being such a woeful failure</a>, just underlined how the motive seems to be to cut the BBC down to size for daring to hold government, regardless of stripe, to account.&nbsp; The Tories' real ire is directed at pieces on the BBC News website <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33344454">like Mark Mardell's from last week</a>, pointing out Cameron has no clothes when it comes to his "full spectrum response" to the attack in Tunisia and instead chose to focus on the inanity of what the BBC calls Islamic State for a reason.&nbsp; Such articles carry far more weight when the BBC so rarely dabbles in outright analysis, even if Mardell was clearly remaining objective.&nbsp; The leak to the Sunday Times framed <a href="https://twitter.com/mattleys/status/617601290219192321">the passing over of the over-75s subsidy</a> as almost a direct response to the BBC daring to cover the reality of cuts to welfare, cuts which are about to fall far wider than previously.<br /><br />We can't of course know what went on in the back and forth between Hall and the government.&nbsp; It was probably made clear in the most certain of terms that if he refused the deal on the table or dared to suggest consulting on it that it would not be on offer in the future.&nbsp; Again, it could turn out that the deal is better than it seems.&nbsp; It could force the BBC to finally sort out its problems of management, which have not improved in the slightest even as journalists and others with years of service have been let go.&nbsp; It might lead to some hard choices that should have been taken years ago: there is no reason why Radio 1, 1 Xtra, even Radio 2 couldn't be privatised, as they without a doubt have long stifled commercial alternatives, almost all of which are laughably terrible.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">From the other side though, this really does look like the beginning of the end of the BBC, forced into cutting services which are popular and in turn undermining the esteem in which the corporation continues to be held, leaving the licence fee ever more precarious as the media landscape continues evolving at speed.&nbsp; The beneficiaries will just happen to be those whom already have far too much power, whether they be the government of the day or the corporate media that overwhelmingly backed said government.&nbsp; The losers?&nbsp; Everyone else.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-beginning-of-end.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-5031608909670244426Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:35:00 +00002015-07-03T11:35:34.777+01:00Glastonburymiscellanymusicnon-politicsyoutube video postsCan't do without you.<center><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Fo_fQ45wtCI" width="480"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sLJ-labsavo" width="480"></iframe></center>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/07/cant-do-without-you.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-5150268709677725858Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:15:00 +00002015-07-06T18:50:52.758+01:00BBC bashingDavid Cameronforeign policyIraqIslamic StatepoliticsSyriaLet's call the whole thing off.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Have you heard about the debate that's been electrifying Westminster the past few days?&nbsp; No, it's not the Labour leadership contest, <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/07/oh-for-incompetent-government.html">or the government's plan to abolish child poverty</a> by deciding it henceforth doesn't exist.&nbsp; And no, it's not the one about <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2015/jun/30/kim-kardashian-sex-tape-flag-glastonbury-kanye-west">the Kim Kardashian flag at Glastonbury either</a>.<br /><br />Yep, the big fight in parliament this week has been <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/29/david-cameron-nitpicks-over-name-isis-isil-daesh-islamic-state">over what the BBC calls Islamic State</a>.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/02/bbc-should-not-be-impartial-isis-chris-grayling">The fiends in charge of news at Auntie</a> have been calling Islamic State Islamic State, with the reasoning that's what Islamic State is called.&nbsp; Apparently though this name is deeply discomforting, not to Muslims who know full well they're not being tarred with the same brush by a broadcaster referring to a terrorist group by its actual name, but to politicians who <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/02/bbc-rejects-mps-calls-to-refer-to-islamic-state-as-daesh">instead insist on calling Islamic State Isil</a>.&nbsp; Which is an acronym of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.&nbsp; Or there's others who insist on referring to <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2015/jul/02/why-the-daily-mail-is-right-to-support-the-bbc-over-islamic-state">Islamic State by the acronym Daesh</a>, which is arrived at via Islamic State's literal Arabic name, al-Dawla al-Islamiya fil Iraq wa’al Sham.&nbsp; Only this was mainly adopted in the first place because it sounds like the Arabic term Dahes, which means to sow discord, and so is meant pejoratively.<br /><br />The debate is, all but needless to say, unbelievably fucking stupid.&nbsp; All of the names have problems: calling the group by what it calls itself should be the obvious thing to do, but then the media have almost never done so previously.&nbsp; IS originates from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanzim_Qaidat_al-Jihad_fi_Bilad_al-Rafidayn">the group started by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi</a>, which fairly swiftly pledged allegiance to al-Qaida, and so became known as al-Qaida in Iraq, the name it was almost always referred to as by the media up until last year.&nbsp; It in fact went through two more name changes, becoming the Mujahideen Shura Council for a time, before changing to the simple Islamic State of Iraq at the height of its (then) control of Iraqi territory.&nbsp; The Guardian, for instance, tends to split the difference and call it Isis, which makes something approaching sense as referring to Syria as either the Levant or Sham, both archaic terms, is exceptionally daft.<br /><br />According to David Cameron, calling Islamic State Islamic State is misleading and potentially damaging as it is neither Islamic nor a state.&nbsp; To which one response should be: how about you go and tell Mr al-Baghdadi to his face that his group isn't Islamic and the territory it holds doesn't amount to a state, Dave?&nbsp; I envision a scene akin to the one from Mars Attacks, where President Jack Nicholson delivers <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPMmC0UAnj0">a why can't we all be friends speech with such passion</a> it brings tears to the Martian leader's eyes.&nbsp; They shake hands, then a contraption pierces Nicholson straight through the heart and a little Martian flag pops out the end.&nbsp; Even if you agree with Cameron, that doesn't alter the fact that if you use Isil or Daesh you're still calling it Islamic State, you're just not spelling the damn thing out.&nbsp; If we're going to be precious about it, we might as well just call them Those Murderous Jihadist Cunts and be done with it.<br /><br />Part of the reason our leaders <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33344454">have been squabbling about what the BBC is doing is</a>, predictably, because they haven't gone the first clue about what to do to respond to the attack in Tunisia.&nbsp; If you <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/terrorism-and-victimhood.html">start claiming there's going to be a full spectrum response</a> against a group that poses an "existential threat" while not actually doing anything new you are rather asking for it.&nbsp; Hence the feelers put out today about extending airstrikes into Syria itself, which to give the government its due, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/02/labour-to-look-very-very-seriously-at-plan-to-target-isis-in-syria">isn't as cretinous an idea as it once was</a>.&nbsp; It's fairly pointless being opposed to ourselves chucking bombs at IS in Syria when the Americans have been doing it for nigh on 10 months now, especially when it's long been obvious they have been informing the Syrians of where they're going to be targeting.<br /><br />It's also fairly pointless to be opposed because just chucking bombs at IS has been shown to be fairly pointless.&nbsp; IS controls more territory in the two countries now than they did when the airstrikes began: the only times they've had an effect has been in Kobane, where the Kurds were effectively allied with the US and calling in strikes themselves, in breaking the siege on Mount Sinjar, and in softening up the IS forces on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-32199244">the ground ahead of advances by the Iraqi "army"</a>, i.e. the Shia militias that are now the de facto army.&nbsp; As the new chair of the foreign affairs committee <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/jul/02/fallon-told-air-strikes-against-isis-in-syria-could-make-little-difference-politics-live#block-5594f4e3e4b03edf9cb7bf22">Crispin Blunt said this morning</a>, joining in the strikes now adds up to nothing more than sharing the burden of attacks with the Americans, while putting the country into a legally grey area.&nbsp; IS cannot be defeated from the air: the gains against it have only been won in partnership with ground forces.&nbsp; Without a stronger ally in both Iraq and Syria, and neither the Kurdish militias or the Shia equivalent can be that ally, IS isn't going anywhere.<br /><br />The Americans have been complaining <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/06/08/still-no-plan-to-defeat-the-islamic-state/">for a while there is no strategy for defeating IS</a>, and that's because the current stalemate seems preferable, terrible as it is to the alternatives.&nbsp; If we swallow our pride and ally with Assad now despite everything, we risk driving the jihadis fighting IS back into their arms.&nbsp; Even if IS was pushed back into Iraq solely, that won't change the fact the country's Sunnis in the main welcomed the jihadis because of the discrimination and contempt they faced under Maliki, which hasn't gone away.&nbsp; Nor do they rate their chances of survival when faced with the militias that previously acted as death squads at the time of the all out civil conflict.&nbsp; The only realistic solutions are federalism or complete partition, with three separate states, something that would be opposed by all sides (excepting the Kurds), all of whom still believe everything can return to how things stood this time last year without explaining how.&nbsp; Faced with these options, it's not surprising politicians would rather chide the BBC than explain how desperate the situation is for the people in the region, if not in truth for us.&nbsp; That Iraq war, eh?<br /><br />P.S.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Staying with that thought, here's some number crunching:</span><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><br />187 - <a href="https://fullfact.org/factcheck/immigration/syrian_refugees_uk-45984">number of Syrian refugees so far granted asylum</a> in the UK under the Vulnerable Person Relocation scheme</span><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><br />664 - <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/01/sir-nicholas-winton">number of children Nicholas Winton</a>, who died yesterday, helped to escape the Nazis in 1939</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/07/lets-call-whole-thing-off.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-7987111259180368236Wed, 01 Jul 2015 19:30:00 +00002015-07-01T20:32:35.804+01:00child povertyConservativesDavid CameroneconomicsGeorge OsborneIain Duncan Smithpoliticsspending cutstax creditsOh for an incompetent government.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Government, we tend to think, is at its worst when it's either incompetent, or obtuse.&nbsp; Well, excepting those who really do believe, as the Gipper put it, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0CCIQtwIwAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxhYJS80MgYA&amp;ei=4yyUVbbVNMqtU8T6r_gG&amp;usg=AFQjCNHklGy0iOd6oShv6cboAPlUD63OoQ&amp;sig2=yqv2iD_lUwokwTaXb6ebrQ">"I'm from the government and I'm here to help"</a>.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/30/isis-spread-libya-sowed-seeds-tunisia-attack-philip-hammond">Philip Hammond wringing his hands</a> about how the Tunisian gunman Seifeddine Rezgui was likely trained in the "ungoverned spaces" of Libya and then in his next breath defending the intervention that led to that very space being ungoverned is pretty much par for the course.&nbsp; We expect government to defend itself despite knowing full well it had more than a hand in how the current situation came about.&nbsp; It's just how it works.<br /><br />The same goes for the foisting of the <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2015/06/membership-of-conservative-party-may-be.html">legal requirement on schools, hospitals and prisons to prevent extremism</a>, and the ridiculous official definition of what constitutes "extremism" ("the vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs").&nbsp; <a href="http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/node/6125">The path to radicalisation is different in almost every case</a>, and the idea that a teacher reporting up the chain that one child has an exceptionally negative view of homosexuality could ever prevent something further down the line is completely absurd; the government knows this.&nbsp; Nonetheless, Nicky Morgan, forever looking as though she's just put a hot chip in her mouth seconds before being dazzled by studio lights, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-33325654">must go on television to insist</a> that black is in fact white, as government has to be seen to be doing something.&nbsp; It isn't simple coincidence this has the effect of putting more responsibility on the shoulders of teachers, transforming them yet further into social workers, as it couldn't be clearer <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0CCMQqQIwAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Feducation-33310736&amp;ei=BkCUVZjLLMqtU8T6r_gG&amp;usg=AFQjCNHcrMP1mVpOHxK6PK12zwrrMtdqZA&amp;sig2=vHUJvBAI1TgqaagcN6W0zw">the Tories hate the entire profession with a passion</a>, but it's a happy side effect.&nbsp; The government approach to radicalisation seems to be that so much as discussing what might lead to it in schools is tantamount to a betrayal of British values, and if you don't talk about it, clearly it doesn't exist.&nbsp; Job sorted, now we can get back to putting the <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/19/pm-to-urge-muslims-and-isps-stop-giving-credence-to-extremist-ideology">blame wholly on Muslims as though they're a homogeneous entity</a>?<br /><br />No, government is most definitely at its worst when completely and utterly open about what it's doing, and yet still lies about it.&nbsp; George Osborne's second budget of the year, now only a week away, should finally start to set out precisely where the £12bn in welfare cuts are going to be found.&nbsp; As has been apparent for quite some time, if you're going to protect pensioners, the disabled and not cut child benefit, the only possible way to get close to that figure is to do something very drastic indeed to both tax credits and housing benefit, both of which are mainly claimed by those in-work.&nbsp; David Cameron started the softening up process last week with his deeply disingenuous speech <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33221966">about putting an end to the "merry-go-round"</a> of those on low incomes being taxed only to then be handed the money straight back.&nbsp; It didn't seem to matter that's how the tax system in general works: you are taxed, and services are there as and when you need them.<br /><br />The obvious problem with cutting child tax credits back to the level they were introduced at back in 2003, <a href="http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/7762">one of the most efficient ways of clawing back £5bn</a>, as identified by the IFS, is that you're not hitting the nasty undeserving poor, the scummy mummies and the perpetually drunk, but the strivers at the heart of the "one nation" the Tories have suddenly discovered they stand for.&nbsp; Even worse, there is or rather was the small problem of the <a href="http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05585">2020 child poverty target</a> that Gordon Brown managed to get enshrined in law in the dying days of the last Labour government.&nbsp; One of the targets, long criticised by Iain Duncan Smith, was the aim to reduce relative child poverty, defined as family income 60% below the median, to less than 10%.<br /><br />What to do?&nbsp; Even at this point rethink the cuts?&nbsp; Perhaps not sell off RBS until the share price means <a href="https://twitter.com/simonperry/status/613668560645300224">the taxpayer won't lose the equivalent of £13bn</a>, as Osborne wants to?&nbsp; Don't be silly.&nbsp; No, you just scrap the target entirely, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/01/government-scrap-legal-requirements-child-poverty">as IDS has today done</a>.&nbsp; You see, the aim of reducing relative child poverty has led to "unintended consequences for good reasons", namely the increase in tax credits.&nbsp; And this hasn't really had the effect of dealing with poverty; after all, if you're only £1 better off than the 60% below benchmark, you're still damn poor, aren't you?&nbsp; Besides, there are the perverse side effects of the target, such as how when everyone is worse off, such as after a recession, it means there are supposedly fewer paupers than there were before.&nbsp; Or if the government puts pensions up, the opposite becomes true.<br /><br />Instead the government will focus entirely on getting social mobility going.&nbsp; Measured will be worklessness and family breakdown, as well as debt and drug dependency.&nbsp; IDS has long been obsessed with worklessness, and for good reason: <a href="https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/work-shy-dole-scroungers-so-last-century/">as Rick pointed out</a>, and <a href="http://www.resolutionfoundation.org/publications/an-ocean-apart/">recent studies by</a> <a href="http://www.resolutionfoundation.org/publications/making-it-work-final-report-of-the-resolution-foundation-review-of-universal-credit/">the Resolution Foundation have found</a>, worklessness, let alone the long-term worklessness the Tories have so often identified as being the root of all evil in the benefits system, barely exists any more.&nbsp; There are more people in work in poverty than not, for the reason that work has become that much more insecure and low paid.&nbsp; Tax credits have duly gone up to compensate.&nbsp; As commentators pointed out after David Cameron's speech last week, <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0CCIQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newstatesman.com%2Fpolitics%2F2015%2F06%2Fdavid-cameron-has-borrowed-ed-milibands-methods-he-may-end-ed-milibands-fate&amp;ei=1j6UVcbMAYvsUt_KoEg&amp;usg=AFQjCNGfTisfLMaHKGun7DeFMXeQO0PbmA&amp;sig2=A7_-THMAHhDUmlyaaWEnkg">it was Ed Miliband who tried to flesh out an alternative</a> with his clumsy predistribution.&nbsp; Now the Tories have their majority they don't need to bother to find that alternative: they can just cut tax credits as a whole, say you voted for this, and argue their great economic plan will see everyone's wages go up.&nbsp; Eventually.&nbsp; IDS getting rid of the child poverty target was simply the final hurdle.&nbsp; He's been completely open about why he's done it, while still putting in place a diversion.<br /><br />Next week the government will announce that the poorest are about to get poorer.&nbsp; It won't of course be presented like that, and no doubt another rise in the income tax threshold will come alongside it, which will mainly benefit those on middle incomes but will look as though it's helping those on low wages.&nbsp; The blame will be put not on those who caused the crash, who might in fact be rewarded with <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/30/labour-ends-call-50p-tax-rate-chris-leslie-warns-chancellor-further-cut">another cut in the top rate of income tax</a>, but the Labour party.&nbsp; Labour in turn might find the remaining fire in its belly, but the leadership contest so far has revolved around accepting the narrative set by the Tories and the right-wing press, so it's unlikely to last long.&nbsp; Besides, summer's here, parliament's about to go into recess, and by the time it returns it's practically time for the conferences.&nbsp; <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-intoxication-of-power-via-simpsons.html">Osborne and Cameron some say aren't ideological</a>, that the cock-up version of history is always more convincing the conspiratorial one.&nbsp; Even if true, it doesn't alter the fact the Tories are doing this because they want to, not because it's the best, let alone fairest way to reduce the deficit.&nbsp; Give me incompetent government over this any day.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/07/oh-for-incompetent-government.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-91769867129776525Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:59:00 +00002015-07-03T01:00:40.157+01:00mockeryNicky MorganpoliticsstupidityterrorismMembership of Conservative party 'may be sign of extremism'<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Education secretary Nicky Morgan has defended the government ahead of tomorrow's introduction of a legal requirement on schools to prevent extremism.<br /><br />Morgan, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-33325654">who still looks visibly surprised to be in a position of any authority</a> whatsoever, was combative.&nbsp; "What our critics have to understand is this puts us under the same level of scrutiny as everyone else.&nbsp; And let's be honest here, the Conservative party could until recently have fallen foul of our definition of what extremism is.&nbsp; The mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs? I should coco."<br /><br />"Individual liberty is all well and good, but if it leads to someone saying things we now declare to be extremism of the non-violent variety then obviously we have to step in," Morgan continued.&nbsp; "As for the rule of law, the law is whatever we declare it to be, and if we don't like the interpretation of one judge, well, we can always get that of another.&nbsp; Nor are we safe when it comes to democracy, as we have no problem whatsoever with palling up with some of the most unpleasant governments on the face of the planet, like our good friends the Saudis, who respond to demands for freedom of thought <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-33039815">with the sword and the whip</a>.&nbsp; Did you see there was another attack <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-33322431">today in Yemen claimed by Isil on the Houthis</a>?&nbsp; We're hoping no one notices that we are on the same side as IS there, not to forget allied with al-Qaida's affiliate the Nusra front in Syria."<br /><br />Asked whether it was the height of hypocrisy for Morgan to claim that homophobia might be a sign of extremism <a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/12/04/nicky-morgan-i-stand-by-vote-against-same-sex-marriage-and-britain-is-a-christian-country/">when she and many other Conservatives opposed gay marriage</a>, Morgan gave a remarkably straight answer.&nbsp; "Well, obviously.&nbsp; But we either can't or won't do anything real that might help tackle extremism, so we decided making life even more miserable for some of the people least likely to vote for us was as good a way of any of showing we're doing something."</span><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><br />In other news:<br />Fifteen-year-old threatened with TPIM for describing teacher as "well gay"<br />Parents of latest IS runaway blame teachers, police, government, social media, Basil Brush, Charlotte Church, and Buzz Aldrin for her disappearance<br />Counter-terrorism exercise held in London, officers trained to shoot for head of nearest Brazilian<br />Labour party abandons policy of social democracy, as "<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/30/labour-ends-call-50p-tax-rate-chris-leslie-warns-chancellor-further-cut">issue is gone"</a></span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/membership-of-conservative-party-may-be.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-3430589914099833535Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:52:00 +00002015-06-29T22:52:34.040+01:00ConservativesDavid Cameronforeign policyIslamic StatepoliticsSousse attackSyriaterrorismTunisiaTerrorism and victimhood.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/25/zack-davies-racist-guilty-attempted-murder-dentist">The family of Dr Sarandev Bhambra</a> had a point last week.&nbsp; If the murder of Lee Rigby was a terrorist attack, <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2013/05/sigh.html">despite it failing to terrorise anyone other than those who wanted to be</a>, then surely the attempted murder of Bhambra by Zackery Davies, which he claimed to be an attempt to avenge Rigby's death, was also.&nbsp; Davies was almost your stereotype white supremacist: a loner who had the obligatory copy of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_Diaries">the Turner Diaries alongside all the usual Nazi paraphernalia</a>, that masturbatory genocidal fantasy which concludes with a suicide attack on the Pentagon, he also as now tends to be the custom admired the barbarism of Islamic State, despite the obvious contradictions.&nbsp; He may though also be mentally ill, and the judge has requested psychiatric reports before he sentences him.&nbsp; One of the killers of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebowale, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/lee-rigby-killer-michael-adebowale-to-appeal-against-life-sentence-due-to-mental-health-problems-9607774.html">has also since been transferred to Broadmoor for treatment</a>, and is appealing against the length of his 45-year sentence on those grounds.<br /><br />Branding the murderous actions of individuals without any links to specific terrorist groups, and in some instances even those who do have such links is to give in to precisely the self-aggrandisement and narcissism that motivated them in the first place.&nbsp; Davies posing in front of swastikas and <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/lee-rigby-killer-michael-adebowale-to-appeal-against-life-sentence-due-to-mental-health-problems-9607774.html">the flag of the Afrikaner Resistance Movement</a> is of a piece with the suspected Charleston church murderer <a href="http://www.doynews.com/article/killer-manisfesto-dylan-roof-was-inspired-george-zimmerman-case-rants-against-black-race">Dylann Roof burning the Star and Stripes</a>, waving the Confederate flag and as with so many previous mass killers leaving behind a "manifesto" attempting to justify the unjustifiable.&nbsp; One line, and one line only is worth dignifying: "We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet," he wrote. "Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me."&nbsp; The exact same line of thinking is now espoused by the successors to the mantle of al-Qaida, the same one grasped by Adebowale and Michael Adebolajo.<br /><br />Murder/suicide rarely excites any more.&nbsp; How could it when the TV news in recent years has often seemed to be one long parade of atrocities?&nbsp; If you're going to go down in a blaze of ignominy, the thinking seems to be, you might as well make it look good for the 24 hour news networks.&nbsp; A case in point was the first of Friday's reported terrorist attacks, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/28/islamic-terror-france-beheading">the apparent attempt by Yassin Salhi</a> to cause a major incident at the Air Products chemical factory in Saint-Quentin-Fallavier.&nbsp; The French president Francois Hollande instantly branded it a terrorist incident only for the situation to become more confused once it emerged that despite beheading his boss and the use of a flag with the Islamic profession of faith on it, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/france-beheading-attack-yassin-salhi-tells-investigators-he-murdered-and-beheaded-his-boss-because-of-problems-at-home-and-at-work-10350887.html">Salhi told the police his motivations were personal more than political</a>.&nbsp; He might have been or still be a fundamentalist, having previously been on the police's radar, but the use of jihadi iconography and methods seems the excuse rather than the reason.&nbsp; Nor have foreign connections been discovered as yet, pouring scorn on the media's grasping for a link between France, Tunisia and Kuwait.<br /><br />Last week at times this country seemed to have descended into a self-pitying wreck, feeling sorry for itself as all around it burned.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33235157">The strike at Calais which gave hundreds of desperate migrants</a> a better chance than usual of stowing away for the journey across the channel once again electrified the media at large, with the same old why-oh-whying about why do they come here rather than stay on the continent rearing its head for the umpteenth time.&nbsp; I waited and waited in vain for someone to point out that the numbers in Calais wanting to come to Britain are tiny compared <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/15/europe/why-migrants-are-dying-to-reach-italy/">to the over 100,000 that have made it to Europe</a> so far this year, most of whom have either stayed in Italy or Greece or tried to get to Germany or Sweden, the two main destinations for Syrian refugees in particular.&nbsp; There was however no shortage of people convinced it was all down to how generous our benefit system is, the myth that refuses to die and never will so long as broadcasters and the press either push it themselves or don't bother to challenge it.<br /><br />And there right in the centre was David Cameron.&nbsp; While the big boys round the EU summit table tried and failed to agree on both sharing out said number of migrants more fairly and keeping Greece in the Euro, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33281019">there he was pushing his pathetic little renegotiation agenda</a>, to much sighing and eye-rolling from everyone else.&nbsp; Britain has often stood out on its own, sometimes by choice, sometimes not, but rarely has it looked so self-absorbed and obtuse as of late.<br /><br />This complete lack of apparent wider awareness has manifested itself just as it has in the past in the reaction to the massacre in Sousse.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/29/uk-full-spectrum-response-tunisia-attack-isis">Cameron promises a "full spectrum" response to the "existentialist" threat</a> posed by Islamic State.&nbsp; No one has the slightest idea what a full spectrum response entails, and Cameron apparently doesn't know what existentialist means or otherwise he wouldn't make such an utterly ridiculous statement, but that's the least of our worries.&nbsp; How much of a role Islamic State truly played in the attack doesn't really matter; that they claimed it whereas they didn't the incident in France is evidence enough they pulled the strings.&nbsp; Nor does it matter that there's very little you can do to prevent one fanatic from gunning down Western tourists on the beach when north Africa has been thrown into flux by the absence of effective government in Libya.&nbsp; If anything, that's it taken this long for jihadists to realise that far too much can go wrong with bombings when a trained lone attacker armed with an automatic weapon and grenades can kill just as many if not more people is proof in itself of just how non-existentialist the threat is.<br /><br />The point is our foreign policy, such as it is, seems deliberately designed to increase rather than decrease the threat.&nbsp; Cameron isn't wrong when he says there would be a threat regardless of whether or not we were personally involved in bombing Islamic State in Iraq.&nbsp; Theresa May was almost certainly right in saying Brits weren't deliberately targeted in Sousse; westerners as a whole were.&nbsp; Nor does Islamic State care one jot about the effect the massacre will have on tourism in Tunisia.&nbsp; All its cadres are interested in is the number of decadent westerners slaughtered for daring to feel safe in an Arab country.&nbsp; Indeed, little is more likely to excite the always priapic IS devotees than white women in bikinis lying dead in pools of blood, as potent a mixture of the paradoxical motivations of your average teenage jihadi as it's possible to imagine.<br /><br />I apologise for making this argument for what seems the thousandth time, as even I'm tired of it.&nbsp; IS nevertheless only exists in its current form because of Syria, and owes some of its success to our refusal to, <a href="http://flyingrodent.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/whatocracy.html">as the Times put it when demanding that we pal up</a> with Sisi in Egypt "work with the political order as it exists in the Arab world and not as [we] wish it to be".&nbsp; Regardless of how and why, the west as a whole came to the conclusion that Assad was doomed, that it was only a matter of time before he fell or fled.&nbsp; It hasn't happened.&nbsp; Rather than reassess the situation four years down the line, accept that regardless of his being a chemical weapon using killer of his own people that he's not going anywhere and that his army is the only reliable force on the ground other than the Kurdish militias, we'd still rather pretend to be achieving something by attacking IS from the air even as more westerners travel to join them and others launch attacks in their name.&nbsp; IS exploited the vacuum in Syria, as well as the support from both the west and the other Arab countries that flowed to the "opposition" to undermine Iraq and make its comeback there.<br /><br />Here in short is just how fucked western policy in the Middle East currently is.&nbsp; In Yemen we're supporting <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-33245757">Saudi Arabia's brutal and ineffective air war against the Houthis</a>, backed indirectly by the Iranians.&nbsp; In Iraq we're in effective league with Shia militias backed by Iran against IS, which is backed by the Sunnis who prefer the brutal regime of the caliphate to the discrimination they faced under the Shia-dominated Baghdad government.&nbsp; In Syria we are variously backing the remnants of the Free Syrian Army, assorted other "moderates" and the Kurdish militias against both the Assad regime and Islamic State.&nbsp; In reality this means we are in alliance with the Sunni states of Saudia Arabia and Qatar, who have gone back and forth <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/syrian-civil-war-jabhat-alnusras-massacre-of-druze-villagers-shows-the-group-is-just-as-nasty-as-isis-10318348.html">between funding and supporting outright jihadi and very slightly</a> more moderate Islamic opposition groups, against Assad, supported by Iran and helped by Hezbollah, also backed by Iran.&nbsp; Despite claims of both IS and Assad being pushed back and so on, in truth we're in pretty much the same position as this time last year.&nbsp; Libya meanwhile remains in turmoil and has turned into the conduit through which the refugees from these conflicts, along also with others from Eritrea and Somalia and your common garden economic migrants are making the trip across the Mediterranean.&nbsp; We don't need to reiterate what went on in Libya, do we?&nbsp; Good.<br /><br />Cameron is thus reduced to the platitude of a "full-spectrum response" and the ludicrous claim that a rag-tag army of nihilist throwbacks threaten our very existence because he either can't do anything or won't do anything.&nbsp; Further western intervention is precisely what IS wants and the Americans failed in any case to destroy al-Qaida in Iraq when boots were on the ground.&nbsp; We refuse to accept that IS is more of a threat to regional stability than Assad, and so won't ally with the only army in either Iraq or Syria that somewhat functions.&nbsp; We continue to ignore how Saudi Arabia funds the mosques and preachers that spread the Wahhabi precursor to Islamic State's takfiri jihadism.&nbsp; Cameron talks of the struggle of our generation when western policy up to now has either targeted individuals rather than the ideology itself and where it springs from, or has made things worse through either incompetence, as in Iraq, or by choice, as in Libya.&nbsp; We are apparently to be intolerant of intolerance, only without a countervailing narrative to rival that which appeals to a distinct minority, some of whom might as Roof put it "take it to the real world".&nbsp; The vast majority won't.&nbsp; That won't however stop ministers from reaching to the law, further restricting free speech in the name of protecting British values.&nbsp; Anything other than admit our mistakes and change course, and think of ourselves as anything other than victims.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/terrorism-and-victimhood.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-3356703204327509824Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:22:00 +00002015-06-29T18:40:42.389+01:00mockeryScum-watchSun-watchterrorismAL-SUN PLOT TO BOMB UK TODAY<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6518366/Islamic-State-monster-aimed-to-kill-British-soldiers.html?CMP=spklr-_-S9SunSocial-_-FBPAGE-_-TheSun-thesun-_-20150626-_-News-_-201361053">A plot by the Sun newspaper to bomb an Armed Forces Day</a> parade in Britain has been foiled by the Islamic State, the Raqqa Guardian can reveal.<br /><br />The plot, intended to target the unit of murdered soldier Lee Rigby, was disrupted after Islamic State informed the British police and security services of how the newspaper's journalists had made contact with them.<br /><br />"They told us they were willing to do the work for Allah," said Abu Oo Ee Oo Ah Ah Ting Tang Walla Walla Bing Bang al-Farqu, "which tipped us off immediately.&nbsp; None of our recruits talk like that, as they aren't complete imbeciles.&nbsp; We realised from the start they were either a journalist, or an especially stupid spy, and so played them at their own game.&nbsp; We first asked if they had access to firearms, then gave them a bunch of fake ingredients and instructions on how to make a pressure cooker bomb.&nbsp; We even told them to film a martyrdom video, just to make it seem authentic.&nbsp; They even believed the crap we told them about spraying the shrapnel with rat poison, for goodness sake."<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/27/police-foil-islamic-state-isis-attack-uk-armed-forces-day-parade">A Scotland Yard spokesman said</a>: "It is always helpful when journalists invent terrorist plots, as the Sun did in this case, as we clearly don't have enough to do already.&nbsp; It also makes the public more likely to jump at their own shadow and pick on brown people with backpacks, which is exactly the kind of behaviour we think should be encouraged."<br /><br />Abu Rupert al-Murdoch could not be reached for comment. <br /><br />Inside:<br />Page 3 - Today's martyrdom lovely<br />Page 94 - Actual Brits killed in real terrorist attack</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/al-sun-plot-to-bomb-uk-today.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-1734740112227474065Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:18:00 +00002015-06-19T19:56:51.607+01:00hiatusindiemiscellanymusicnon-politicstechnoyoutube video postsEuropa hymn.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"></span><br /><center><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HBHyOLR5_rk" width="480"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cFZqqax4W9o" width="480"></iframe></center><br /><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">I'm not here next week. Enjoy yourselves in the meantime.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/europa-hymn.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-1657208486696069762Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:55:00 +00002015-06-18T20:05:20.635+01:00Florence and the Machinemusicmusical terrorismnon-politicsA genuine question.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Has any other group as <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/jun/17/florence-the-machine-replace-foo-fighters-friday-glastonbury-2015">objectively rancid as Florence and the Machine</a> managed to gain both commercial success and a pass from the critics?&nbsp; The two other bands that came instantly to mind, Mumford and Sons, and Coldplay, don't really count as both have received the odd critical mauling and are sniggered about, if not to the extent of the mocking they receive elsewhere.&nbsp; Plus, to be fair, Coldplay's first two albums aren't that bad.&nbsp; Closest in fact might be Adele, but then I seem to be in the minority in finding her oeuvre (Rolling in the Deep excepted) insufferable.&nbsp; Any suggestions?</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/a-genuine-question.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-4074557697236418860Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:59:00 +00002015-06-18T00:51:27.767+01:00foreign policyIslamic StateIslamistsjihadistsmedia analysispoliticsradicalisationShiraz MaherSyriaterrorismSyrian trilogy in Yorkshire pottery.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">All American trilogy, the future's dead fundamentally / It's so fucking funny, it's absurd<br /><br />Did you see the statement put out by the family of Tahla Asmal, the 17-year-old who now carries the distinction of being the youngest Britisher to become a suicide bomber?&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/14/west-yorkshire-teenager-talha-asmal-britain-youngest-suicide-bomber">“Talha was a loving, kind, caring and affable teenager,”</a> it begins, before going on to firmly place the blame for his decision elsewhere.&nbsp; "Talha’s tender years and naivety were, it seems however, exploited by persons unknown, who, hiding behind the anonymity of the worldwide web, targeted and befriended Talha and engaged in a process of deliberate and calculated grooming of him."<br /><br />Perhaps Talha was all of these things.&nbsp; Perhaps his tender years and naivety were indeed exploited.&nbsp; Plenty of 17-year-olds think about killing themselves, if not necessarily other people at the same time; I certainly did.&nbsp; Perhaps he was targeted and befriended, even groomed, although frankly this transferral of the terminology of sexual exploitation and abuse to that of comprehensively changing someone's outlook on life as a whole in a very short space of time doesn't really cut it.<br />&nbsp; The insistence that Asmal's decision to not only go and join Islamic State, but also take part in a "martyrdom operation", as they're called by jihadists, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/15/talha-asmal-britains-youngest-suicide-bomber-savile-town-iraq-isis">was all down to faceless individuals on the internet</a> does though take a knock when you learn his best friend, next-door neighbour and and <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/07/brother-of-hassan-munshi-uk-youngest-convicted-terrorist-feared-joined-isis">fellow emigree to IS was Hassan Munshi</a>, brother of Hammad Munshi, convicted back in 2008 at the age of 18 for possessing documents useful to terrorists.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2988926/Britains-youngest-teenage-terrorist-a-wake-up-call-for-parents.html">Munshi's defence at the time was</a>, uncannily, that he was groomed by the two older men involved in the plot.<br /><br />Again, perhaps he was.&nbsp; You might though have thought it would have alerted his parents, and especially his grandfather, Yakub Munshi, president of the Islamic Research Institute of Great Britain at the Markazi Mosque in Dewsbury to the potential for Hammad's younger brother to become subject to the same pressures.&nbsp; Perhaps they were and it made no difference.&nbsp; Surely though Asmal's family, devastated and heartbroken, must have been aware of all this.&nbsp; Could it really be that not one, but two Munshis, as well as Amsal were targeted by these calculated and cunning groomers, without anyone becoming aware as to what was going on?<br /><br />One thing is for sure: we seem to be stuck in the same old groove when it comes to radicalisation.&nbsp; <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/02/yes-islamic-state-is-islamic-no-it-isnt.html">It's still about</a> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05zrf7y">foreign policy, Islamophobia, alienation</a>, cries one section; it's about an austere and intolerant interpretation of Islam that either doesn't condemn the likes of IS enough or is outright sympathetic to their purity says another; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/17/roots-radicalisation-identity-bradford-jihadist-causes">no, it's actually to do with identity and belonging</a>, insists someone else.&nbsp; To which the obvious response is: doesn't all of the above play a role?<br /><br />To start with, you have to see what Islamic State for what it is, which is the answer to all things.&nbsp; It's a fundamentally teenage organisation in every sense; just look at the old jihadi grey beards <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/10/how-isis-crippled-al-qaida">Abu Qatada and Abu ­Muhammad al-Maqdisi bemoaning how</a> what they helped bring into being has grown into.&nbsp; Who knew that if you gave religious backing to one group allowing them to kill whoever they feel like that eventually another group would used it to kill whoever <i>they</i> feel like?&nbsp; Islamic State's response to al-Maqdisi's attempts to free the captured Jordanian pilot was the equivalent of a step-child telling their mother's new partner you're not my real dad, only with the added son of a whore insult just to rub it in.<br /><br />IS then not only appeals to those who no longer accept that establishing the caliphate now is illegitimate, as al-Qaida does, to those who see it as their religious duty to fight against the kuffar, whether they be Alawites, the Shia or anyone else they don't agree with, but also to to the most base desires.&nbsp; <a href="http://pando.com/2015/02/12/the-war-nerd-islamic-state-and-american-narcissism/">IS not only promises fighting</a>, <a href="http://www.rferl.org/content/matchmaking-marriage-islamic-state-style/26774719.html">but fucking as well</a>, to male and female alike, so long as the woman is perfectly happy with playing the role of the dutiful wife to someone with a potentially short life expectancy.&nbsp; While you'd think this would appeal more to the recruits from other Arab countries, never underestimate the pressures on young Muslim men as well as women in the west to follow the strictures set down by their parents.<br /><br />This doesn't of course begin to explain <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/17/bradford-sisters-had-undergone-airport-security-checks-before-police">the appeal of IS to the women from Bradford</a>, assumed to have made the journey to Syria.&nbsp; It's not many happily married women with young families who would decide to up sticks to a war zone leaving their husbands behind.&nbsp; Something on that level doesn't ring true.&nbsp; That said, why Syria rather than attempt to stay in Saudi Arabia, unless their very brand of Islam is compatible with that of IS?&nbsp; Their brother having gone to fight doesn't on its own lead to them fleeing to join him, not least taking their children with them to a place of such danger.<br /><br />The entire case of the Dawoods raises those questions of belonging, identity and integration.&nbsp; It also though makes clear that even among those who adhere to a highly conservative brand of Sunni Islam, the numbers who are so taken with the IS vision of life and the world that they'll join it are tiny.&nbsp; When you then have <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2014/06/our-true-shared-values.html">the government's utterly cack-handed overreaction</a>, <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2014/06/michael-gove-proves-his-worth-yet-again.html">first to the Trojan Horse plot</a>, which was nothing of the sort, and where there was no evidence that unpleasant, oppressive and wrong as it was, the conservative Islamic ethos adopted by those Birmingham schools was breeding extremists, combined with the continuing stupidity of the Prevent programme, which has never prevented anything, there is the potential to push those on the edge over into doing something they otherwise wouldn't have.&nbsp; Shiraz Maher is right on almost everything in his piece except for his bizarre invocation of how the colonies fought for Britain in WW1 and WW2 means instilling "British values" is the answer today.&nbsp; The Conservatives don't have the slightest idea what British values are, but they do know how to make more work for schools, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/10/schools-trial-anti-radicalisation-software-pupils-internet?CMP=share_btn_tw">or indeed nurseries</a>, lest there be any 5-year-old terrorists already being groomed for action.<br /><br />The rise of IS and eclipse of al-Qaida also highlights the way the nature of the threat from terrorism is changing, and just how little recognition there has been from all concerned to that effect.&nbsp; The big, major plots of the past have not entirely gone away, but have been superseded by the danger of the lone or working in pairs attacks we've seen.&nbsp; More difficult as these are to prevent, they are just as likely to result in failure, or rather than indiscriminately targeting the public, they focus on the police or specific groups.&nbsp; Spectacular attacks on multiple targets have fallen from favour.&nbsp; With the focus on the jihad in Syria and Iraq, it also means those who do choose to fight are as likely to be disillusioned by the experience and the reality of the situation as they are enthused by it.&nbsp; For all the fear about jihadis coming back from Syria to launch attacks, there has as yet not been a single returnee charged who has been found to have such designs.&nbsp;<br /><br />Here also is the stupidity of the double game being played in Syria: rather than approach those coming back with the intention of trying to persuade others not to make the journey, <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/helping-jihadists-in-syria-while-still.html">the prosecutions continue regardless of the groups</a> being fought with.&nbsp; This is despite <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/syrian-civil-war-jabhat-alnusras-massacre-of-druze-villagers-shows-the-group-is-just-as-nasty-as-isis-10318348.html">Patrick Cockburn reporting how one of the major reasons</a> the non-IS rebels have made such advances since the turn of the year has been a influx of support for the al-Nusra Front, aka al-Qaida's official affiliate in Syria and a direct split from IS, and which Qatar is all but openly supporting.&nbsp; One day, the way policy on Syria has ebbed and flowed will be rued in the same as the war on Iraq now is.&nbsp; Till then, we'll hear more families make their children out to be victims without examining themselves, while the efforts to tackle what extremism there is will continue to fail.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/syrian-trilogy-in-yorkshire-pottery.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-8401317628725645203Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:05:00 +00002015-06-17T17:32:26.724+01:00bloggocksCaroline Criado-Perezhonours systemidentity politicsLabourpoliticssocial networking websitesThis post summarised: I don't understand social media.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">If there's something that never fails to raise a chuckle, it's just how many right-on folk suddenly discover they don't mind in the slightest <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11990088">receiving a honour created by royalty and given out by royalty</a> making them a member of something that no longer exists.&nbsp; That most would also normally blanch at the merest idea of being connected with the empire, for good reason, it's remarkable just how soon they decide otherwise once offered the chance to put some more letters after their name.<br /><br />Yes, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33109755">the Queen's birthday honours list</a> was as delightful as ever, if not more so than usual.&nbsp; Most of the fun comes when Private Eye bothers to look at the list in detail and finds just how many of the recipients owe their awards to their political affiliations, donations or other brown-nosing, or alternatively, to how despite or indeed down to their being bent as a nine bob note they managed to make the grade.&nbsp; Some names do though jump straight out at you, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33107670">like Paul Kenny, leader of the GMB union</a>, essentially receiving a knighthood for being extraordinarily useless at representing his members.&nbsp; Simon Hughes is also rewarded for his services to the coalition by getting a K, a reminder of how brilliant the next round of nominations to the Lords will also be.<br /><br />Then there are the straight up juxtapositions of worthiness.&nbsp; Will Pooley, one of those who volunteered to help fight Ebola in east Africa and nearly died after contracting it himself, is justly recognised with an MBE; awarded an OBE is Caroline Criado-Perez, <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2014/01/revisiting-twitter-hate-machine.html">for getting trolled on Twitter</a>.&nbsp; Alongside her is <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/profile/laura-bates">Laura Bates</a>, behind the phenomenally successful Everyday Sexism project, who receives the resurrected by Cameron British Empire Medal.&nbsp; Considering the major triumph of Everyday Sexism has been to make self-hating, insecure men even less likely to give the merest of compliments to the opposite sex for fear of it being seen as harassment while the actual sexists carry on as they always have, who could possibly object to the award?<br /><br />Getting the nod for an honour is in essence the establishment recognising the recipient as not representing a threat.&nbsp; At opposite ends of the pool are Benedict Bandersnatch, <a href="http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-09-16/benedict-cumberbatchs-claims-of-posh-baiting-are-a-load-of-rubbish-says-freddie-fox">who complained previously about posh-bashing</a>, getting the CBE, while Lenny Henry's <a href="https://www.bafta.org/press/bafta-television-lecture-lenny-henry-to-address-ethnic-diversity-in-the-workforce,317,SNS.html">push for proper representation in the media</a> was no obstacle to his knighthood.&nbsp; The awards for Criado-Perez and Bates meanwhile are just the latest evidence that the fourth-wave of feminism, if it can really be recognised as such, has been co-opted entirely by those it supposedly targets.&nbsp; When Waterstone's has a specific table set aside for the works by the aforementioned and others like Caitlin Moran, as my local has, while also at the same time encompassing Bryony Gordon's fucking everyone in a pair of trousers memoir <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jun/22/the-wrong-knickers-decade-chaos-bryony-gordon-review">The Wrong Knickers</a>, appropriation has mostly certain taken place.<br /><br />This not being a threat doesn't mean the public at large are any more receptive or impressed by identity politics, mind.&nbsp; <a href="http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2015/06/12/this-is-not-us-a-reply-to-sunny/">I'm with Paul</a> when he responds to <a href="http://labourlist.org/2015/06/we-failed-to-defeat-the-tories-because-the-left-has-stopped-understanding-the-public/">Sunny Hundal's piece for LabourList</a> that recognises the left-wing social media echo chamber most likely contributed to Labour's loss, in that he says speak for yourself pal.&nbsp; We don't all obsess over mugs with controls on immigration plastered on them, or imagine that activism online can replace activism offline.&nbsp; I've been critical of <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/05/a-return-to-may-7th-and-everything.html">politicians beating themselves up over not talking like the public</a>, when in fact what the complaint is about and Sunny gets is it's not how they sound and the phrases they use, it's the content.&nbsp; He's wrong about Blair getting non-Labour voters in as much as Blair's great success was to come at the precise moment the Tories utterly self-destructed, but he is right about the cultural deficit.<br /><br />Not that hardly anyone outside said echo chambers pays much in the way of attention to Twitter subcultures, let alone your average voter.&nbsp; When issues of identity do reach the mainstream however, as they have recently with Caitlyn Jenner, Rachel Dolezal and Tim Hunt, it's far from clear it's to the benefit of those who are always the first to comment.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/jun/02/caitlyn-jenner-transgender-response-vanity-fair">Jenner's transition</a> invites cynicism because of who she is, regardless of the exact circumstances, as should the way it was presented to the world in a way those welcoming it would normally flinch from.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-33152596">Rachel Dolezal is an almost perfect example</a> <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/commentisfree/2015/jun/12/rachel-dolezal-black-identity-civil-rights-leader">of the double standards associated with racial</a> as opposed to sexual identity, while you don't have to take the Daily Mail line to think <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/13/tim-hunt-forced-to-resign">Hunt harshly treated if still stupid</a>, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/11/tim-hunt-women-scientists">as plenty of commentators have</a>.&nbsp; Despise the way <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/05/acedias-blackest-hole.html">a phony image of the "metropolitan elite" has been created</a> and instilled, as we should, it all feeds into it.&nbsp; This is hardly helped when so often the sites and media associated <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/11/british-national-bird-robin-murderous-bully">with the left do</a> <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/02/applaud-caitlyn-jenner-brave-or-pretty">their best to be a</a> <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/01/men-30s-arent-pressured-kids-answer-not-biological">parody of themselves</a>.&nbsp; Some have for too long celebrated difference for its own sake rather than thought about what makes us belong, unites us.&nbsp; Most pertinently, class has often been overlooked in favour of every other distinction.<br /><br />It's not just the left who have given in to the lures of the echo chamber, of course, and this doesn't mean those ideals are the wrong ones.&nbsp; For every person who banged on about immigration mugs, there are also those who don't think what ostensibly remains a centre-left party should have <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/15/labour-leadership-contest-jeremy-corbyn">someone of the left so much as</a> <a href="http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2015/06/16/the-unwanted-dinner-guest-why-corbyn-is-bad-news-for-labour/">stand for leader</a>, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/politics-blog/11675756/The-lunatic-wing-of-the-Labour-Party-is-still-calling-the-shots.html">as that by itself shows the party</a> is still not "serious".&nbsp; They would seemingly have preferred the contest to be between three candidates with all but identical policies, none of whom seem to understand that Labour faces threats from both the left and right, with the potential for things to get worse before they get better.&nbsp; Equally misguided are those who see fit to comment on the alleged hypocrisy of supposed radicals for cuddling up to the establishment, and then see fit to advise a party of the establishment and its supporters on where it's going wrong.&nbsp; Oh.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/this-post-summarised-i-dont-understand.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-2626209813089089814Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:50:00 +00002015-06-16T17:16:33.499+01:00civil libertiesConservativesDavid AndersonDavid CameronGCHQIntelligence and Security CommitteeMagna CartaMI5MI6politicssecurity servicesTemporaMagna Carta and all that.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">I'd like to think we can all agree it takes a special kind of cretin <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33126723">to use the 800th anniversary of Magna Cart</a>a, the document that established all are equal under the law, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/15/david-cameron-magna-carta-push-british-bill-of-rights-claim">to argue in fact only they can "restore the reputation of human rights"</a>.&nbsp; Considering the chief argument being made for a British Bill of Rights is it would prevent criminals, terrorists and other unworthy sorts <a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/human-rights-act-why-the-conservatives-are-wrong">from invoking Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights</a>, that of the right to a private and family life in order to avoid deportation, although how this would be accomplished without also leaving said convention at the same time as ripping up the Human Rights Act has never been answered, it does put in a whole new perspective David Cameron's decision to say it was "ironic" that "the good name of human rights has sometimes become distorted and devalued".&nbsp; Call me a stuffy pedant, but I'd say it was beyond ironic, in fact an example of a politician without the slightest sense of shame to use Magna Carta as a backdrop to say some will be more equal than others under the law if and when he gets his way.<br /><br />Then again, Magna Carta has always been a symbol rather than anything real in any case.&nbsp; <a href="http://jackofkent.com/2015/06/the-meaning-of-magna-carta/">Everything you think you know about it is almost certainly wrong</a>, and as Jack of Kent so admirably argues, there is no contradiction in politicians and other worthies celebrating a document that cannot be relied on in court <a href="https://twitter.com/JackofKent/status/610468809963634690">while wanting to repeal one on which you can</a>.&nbsp; Rights in the view of so many are things you can expect to be given to you as hard and fast as you can take them, and if you can't, well hard cheese.&nbsp; It's also noticeable historians chuckle and roll their eyes at all this nonsense, knowing full well that Magna Carta sure didn't stop King after King from doing whatever the hell they liked, while politicians, often in the main law or PPE graduates, go into raptures over it.&nbsp; Not all of them, obviously, but a fair number.<br /><br />Cameron's dedication to destroying an act that does work, frankly all too well for the government and establishment's liking, is of a piece with the fondness of the spooks for the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_Investigatory_Powers_Act_2000">Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000</a>.&nbsp; Described by the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation last week as "undemocratic" and "intolerable", with the situation in which we are currently in deemed "unnecessary", <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/when-maintaining-status-quo-feels-like.html">I wondered if the intelligence agencies</a> wouldn't finally see sense and embrace David Anderson's recommendations, couched as they were in language and arguments that mollified libertarians like me while still providing the agencies with the powers they say they need.<br /><br />Yesterday's <a href="https://archive.is/BkuMM">front page piece in the Sunday Times</a> rather answered such thinking.&nbsp; According to a number of anonymous sources, the cache of files taken by Edward Snowden has been successfully cracked by both the Chinese and Russians, leading to MI6 needing to extract a number of agents for fear they could have been killed as a result.&nbsp; The entire report, without needing to read the responses from those in the know, such as <a href="https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/06/14/sunday-times-report-snowden-files-journalism-worst-also-filled-falsehoods/">Glenn Greenwald</a>, <a href="http://notes.rjgallagher.co.uk/2015/06/sunday-times-snowden-china-russia-questions.html">Ryan Gallagher</a> and <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/14/snowden-files-read-by-russia-and-china-five-questions-for-uk-government">the Graun</a>, is bollocks of the hairiest, most obvious kind.&nbsp; Snowden apparently has blood on his hands, and yet there is no evidence of anyone being harmed.&nbsp; Que?<br /><br />You don't have to question how the Russians and Chinese could have gained access to the files when the only people in possession of them are journalists, Snowden himself having destroyed his copies after he handed them over, something not previously questioned by anyone.&nbsp; Nor does another howler, like the precise figure of 1.7m documents accessed by our enemies when the NSA previously admitted it simply didn't and couldn't know how many files Snowden had taken give the game away.&nbsp; It's how crude and transparent the sourcing is: when <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n10/seymour-m-hersh/the-killing-of-osama-bin-laden">Seymour Hersh questions the official version of events</a> in the killing of bin Laden, his reliance on unnamed intelligence sources is ridiculed.&nbsp; Hersh's recent exposes may be nonsense, but they are no less believable than a supposed newspaper of record (stop sniggering) noting down everything briefed to it by a government and then reprinting it verbatim.<br /><br />The "exclusive" given to the Sunday Times is revenge, plain and simple.&nbsp; David Anderson confirmed in his report that without Snowden, absolutely nothing would have changed.&nbsp; The Intelligence and Security Committee had never asked precisely how GCHQ monitored the internet, so it hadn't thought it necessary to keep them up to date with things like Tempora or their relationship with the NSA.&nbsp; Anderson's recommendation that judges review and authorise warrants rather than politicians raises the possibility they might be slightly more critical in their appraisal than ministers have previously, and that would never do.<br /><br />There's also the simple spite factor, that and letting everyone know how they might react in the future.&nbsp; The smashing up of the <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/21/data_storage_blindness_and_blundering/">Guardian's copy in this country of the Snowden files</a> was utterly pointless when it came to "ending the debate", but it carried with it the message of acting because they could.&nbsp; Smearing Snowden further and claiming those dastardly Rushkies and Chinese have got their hands on the locations of our brave spies is meant to reinforce how so much as talking about things we're not supposed to know is to damage our security.&nbsp; You might think you've won this round, it says, with the Anderson report, but just you wait.&nbsp; When all else fails, appeal to the court of public opinion, with its memories of Bletchley Park and hagiographies of Alan Turing.<br /><br />It's utterly pitiful behaviour, and yet it shows how worried the government and the securocrats are.&nbsp; They've done everything they can to deny there is any need for a debate or to worry about what those in the shadows are up to, when <a href="http://boingboing.net/2015/06/03/usa-freedom-act-the-good-the.html">even the American authorities have in the main accepted</a> the powers they had went too far in some areas.&nbsp; Instead of going down the same path, the Anderson report having given them the chance to back down without losing much in the way of face, the age old tactic of anonymous briefing to a trusted hack and newspaper is the response.&nbsp; When you can't make the perfectly reasonable argument that we can't foresee the future, can't know what the next threat might be, and so have to be ready for every eventuality without resorting to outright lies, there is clearly a problem with accountability.&nbsp; They saw back in 1215 that absolute power corrupts absolutely.&nbsp; 800 years on some still need to learn that lesson.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/magna-carta-and-all-that.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-2848999820394857963Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:33:00 +00002015-06-12T11:33:38.585+01:00drum and basshousemiscellanymusicnon-politicsyoutube video postsBlack rose.<center><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RnG85FDmVRM" width="480"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/E6wllpw5udk" width="480"></iframe></center>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/black-rose.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-5495942759379190920Thu, 11 Jun 2015 22:46:00 +00002015-06-11T23:46:17.755+01:00civil libertiesConservativesDavid AndersonGCHQIntelligence and Security CommitteeMI5MI6politicssecurity servicesTemporaWhen maintaining the status quo feels like something to celebrate.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><a href="https://terrorismlegislationreviewer.independent.gov.uk/a-question-of-trust-report-of-the-investigatory-powers-review/">David Anderson QC's review</a> <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/11/uk-intelligence-agencies-should-keep-mass-surveillance-powers-report-gchq">of the various laws authorising and regulating</a> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33092894">the interception of data by the state</a> is as good as we possibly could have hoped for.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2015/03/the-securocrats-win-they-always-win.html">Compared to the work of parliament's</a> <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2014/11/the-real-face-of-21st-century-insecurity.html">Intelligence and Security Committee</a>, well, there's no comparison.&nbsp; Not a single redaction for a start, very little in the way of obfuscation or outright distraction, regardless of how transparent those attempts to muddy the debate have been, and outright recognition that if it had not been for the whistleblowing of Edward Snowden, we would still know almost nothing about the way GCHQ hoovers up our data with the very minimum of oversight.&nbsp; Anderson still, contradictorily, criticises Snowden, but that is to be expected.&nbsp; The independent reviewer of terrorism clearly does not swallow the bluster from the security services <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-illusion-of-oversight.html">that major damage has been done to them</a>, despite accepting "national security" has been affected.&nbsp; When national security is defined so widely, and presumably in this instance includes damage to the reputation of said security services, it could hardly be otherwise.<br /><br />He does nonetheless accept the pleas of GCHQ for the bulk interception of data to be allowed to continue.&nbsp; He did at least manage to persuade the powers that be to disclose the general outline of the examples previously provided to the ISC for why bulk interception, which if nothing else gives us something of an idea as to what we're giving up in terms of privacy in order to prevent.<br /><br />This is not to say the examples given are beyond question (they're contained in Annex 9 of the report): most eye-catching is the claim that without bulk data, an airline worker with links to al-Qaida would not have been convicted.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/11/spies-gchq-anderson-snoopers-charter-bulk-surveilllance-public-trust">As Joshua Rozenberg writes</a>, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/feb/28/british-airways-bomb-guilty-karim">this almost certainly refers to the case of Rajib Karim</a>, who was in email contact with the then leader of al-Qaida in Yemen, Anwar al-Awlaki, since killed in a US drone strike.&nbsp; You would of course expect someone like al-Awlaki to be under surveillance, although how precisely GCHQ identified Karim we can't know.&nbsp; Nor can we know how exactly "bulk data" is being defined in this instance: yes, Karim might not have been identified if al-Awlaki also hadn't been targeted, presumably under the rules governing bulk interception rather than as a specific target, but that's rather different to how our "external communications", i.e. the use of any website not hosted in the UK are considered by the intelligence agencies to fall under bulk interception as a whole.&nbsp; Two of the case studies provided do not so much as relate to subsequent law enforcement action in this country at all.&nbsp; While this is evidence of the efficacy of bulk interception in cases where intelligence or what we would normally consider to be standard surveillance techniques have started off the investigation, it hardly convinces that the ordinary sifting through of the vast amounts of data being collected will ever on its own save lives, or outweigh the potential abuse of such access to personal data.</span><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><br />That aside, the report on the whole is so well argued that if the intelligence agencies had any sense, they would take a good hard look at Anderson's recommendations and five principles, of minimising no-go areas, limited powers, rights compliance, clarity and transparency and a unified approach and adopt them as their own.&nbsp; Anderson writes of just how co-operative everyone was with him, as you would expect, and yet these are the same agencies that once free of the presence of those reviewing them go back to demanding redactions in reports, that over-the-top levels of secrecy be maintained and <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2014/11/time-for-mature-debate.html">the delivering of self-defeating lectures</a> that we're all so familiar with.&nbsp; There is in essence absolutely nothing in the report they should disagree with, at least if they realise things can no longer go on as they were, but whether organisations which by their very nature have to be paranoid and constantly on the lookout for new ways to break things can handle such concepts remains unclear.<br /><br />The problem you suspect will in fact <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/11/downing-street-faces-privacy-fight-call-strip-ministers-surveillance-powers">be more with the politicians than the agencies themselves</a>.&nbsp; Ministers will be loth to give away to judges the authorising of interception warrants, not least because it's another power they'll lose.&nbsp; So too will it affect their direct line into the agencies, and considering the past at times fractious relationship between the spies and politicians, that's not something necessarily to be welcomed.&nbsp; Anderson also reiterates the past criticisms of the proposed Data Communications Bill, aka the snoopers' charter, essentially saying the case for it has still to be made, despite "compulsory retention of records of user interaction with the internet" being "useful", as he terms it.&nbsp; Well yes, useful it would certainly be; as for being justifiable, in the same way as bulk interception is justifiable, not without safeguards far beyond what has been outlined so far.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">All things considered though, especially when we think of how with a Tory majority, a Labour party that looks certain to head back to the right and when the only party remotely interested in civil liberties as a whole has been reduced to a rump, this report in different hands could have been the sum of all fears.&nbsp; Instead it looks set to merely maintain the status quo.&nbsp; These days, that feels like a victory.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/when-maintaining-status-quo-feels-like.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-648941539123244911Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:59:00 +00002015-06-11T00:47:08.866+01:00ConservativesDavid CameroneconomicsGeorge Osbornepoliticsspending cutsThe intoxication of power, via the Simpsons.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">You know what we haven't done for a while?&nbsp; Quoted from the Simpsons, so let's remedy that.&nbsp; In the New Kid on the Block episode, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz8HZPZLZ1U">Bart foolishly asks Homer for advice on the opposite sex</a>.&nbsp; "A woman is a lot like a beer.&nbsp; They smell good, they look good, you'd step over your own mother just to get one.&nbsp; But you can't stop at one, you want to drink another woman!"<br /><br />Homer could just have easily been talking about the intoxicating effects of power.&nbsp; Only it wouldn't have been funny or made anything approaching sense, so would have came from a more recent season of the show.&nbsp; Yes, I just made a the Simpsons ain't what it used to be joke.&nbsp; <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/80029-the-slave-begins-by-demanding-justice-and-ends-by-wanting">Another philosopher</a>, arguably one not quite on the level of Homer but thereabouts, wrote the slave begins by demanding justice and ends by wanting to wear a crown.<br /><br />Very few once they have tasted power find it within themselves to either give it away or relinquish it, at least not without a fight (<a href="http://pando.com/2015/06/08/the-war-nerd-scuds-patriots-the-armies-of-this-age-are-weird/">The War Nerd in his latest post</a> wonders if the Soviet Union is the only empire to have collapsed without a shot being fired, although that's a questionable version of 1989-91).&nbsp; Politicians for decades have promised to devolve power to cities and local communities, only to decide not to once they themselves have power, or find those they want to empower in fact don't really like the idea of mayors or regional assemblies much.&nbsp; London and Scotland are the exceptions that prove the rule, and as we have seen, once given demands for further powers only increase.&nbsp;<br /><br />A case in point is <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/09/alistair-carmichael-legal-petition-election-orkney-shetland">the attempt to force a by-election in Orkney and Shetland</a>, under the specious reasoning that Alistair Carmichael lying about not leaking the comments supposedly made by Nicola Sturgeon to the French ambassador means the contest should be rerun.&nbsp; It's a campaign ran by SNP supporters, but obviously the SNP themselves have nothing to do with it.&nbsp; 56 seats out of 59 just isn't enough when they could they have 57 instead.&nbsp; Not that it's fair to pick just on the SNP, or the Tories with their legislation on trade unions designed to damage Labour, or the likely at some point boundary review.&nbsp; All parties are determined to make life as difficult as possible for their opponents, only realising too late that domination builds resentment and the seeds of eventual downfall.&nbsp;<br /><br />What is a new tactic is the use of legislation to bind a future government to the same path of righteousness as the current one.&nbsp; It's an innovation of especial vanity, an attempt to retain control when the people who put them there in the first place might well have slung them out.&nbsp; It's also, as with so much of our politics now, little more than a gesture when the law can so only easily be repealed by that new government, but it remains a gesture designed to trip up the opposing side in the most petty of fashions.<br /><br />No surprise then that a man as clearly petty as George Osborne is so keen on the mechanism, having pinched it from that other petty man, Gordon Brown.&nbsp; First he attempted to trap Labour by legislating for the next government to be required to cap spending on social security.&nbsp; Then during the election campaign the brilliant idea of making it illegal to raise income tax, VAT or national insurance before 2020 was come up with.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/10/george-osborne-public-finances-victorian-values">Now Osborne has decided it's a wicked wheeze to go one step further</a> with his deficit reduction fetishism and require all future governments to follow his plan to run a budget surplus, or at least so long as the economy's growing, as he's not a complete bastard.<br /><br />Cynics might think it takes some chutzpah for the chancellor who failed to eliminate the deficit in a single parliamentary term as promised to propose to tie the hands of his successors.&nbsp; Considering we're still to be informed also of precisely how the sunlit uplands of the surplus is to be arrived at, demanding all do as Osborne says could be thought of as breathtakingly arrogant.&nbsp; Nothing though is off the table when it comes to continuing to pin the economically incontinent tail on the soiled old Labour donkey, which is of course the real point of Osborne's jape.&nbsp; With some of the Labour leadership candidates now accepting <a href="http://mainlymacro.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/recognising-success-of-macroeconomic.html">the utterly risible idea that they overspent when in government</a>, the obvious riposte to which is to ask exactly what they would have spent less on, and if they answer welfare you reply with a baseball bat with a nail through the top, all the better to demand they sign up to Osborne's completely sensible surplus plan.&nbsp; And if they won't, as the less self-hating ones won't, you carry on lambasting them for not accepting all this austerity is their fault.<br /><br />Everyone's a winner, except for oh, the people who will suffer as a result of the shrinking of the state necessary to reach such a perpetual surplus.&nbsp; <a href="https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/are-the-conservatives-ideologically-driven-state-shrinkers/">The otherwise excellent Flip Chart Rick argues</a> that despite the caricature from some on the left, Osborne and Cameron are not <a href="https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/2015/05/01/the-tories-and-welfare-machiavellian-or-just-muddling-through/">ideological state-shrinkers</a>.&nbsp; When it comes to Cameron he could be right, mainly because there's never been the sense Cameron believes in anything.&nbsp; With Osborne, it's becoming ever more difficult to think otherwise.&nbsp; <a href="https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/2015/06/05/how-big-a-problem-is-the-uks-public-debt/">As Rick has pointed out</a>, both the IMF <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jun/03/oecd-to-george-osborne-spread-the-pain-of-public-spending-cuts">and the OECD have changed their tune</a> of late, advising governments that are not Greece they can dial down the deficit reduction, especially if the proposed cuts have the potential to affect growth.&nbsp; Coupled with how everyone assumed that the £12bn in cuts to welfare were to be negotiated away in the coalition talks, Osborne if he wanted has had more than enough opportunities to step back from his surplus now and surplus forever mantra.&nbsp; Instead, he's gone one step beyond that into the realm of the completely gibberingly stupid.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">That £12bn in cuts to welfare looks unachievable is besides the point: Osborne looks set to try and reach for the top regardless.&nbsp; The difference between playing political games and acting out of ideological purity is a fine one at the best of times.&nbsp; The chancellor has surely now shown his true, somehow even ghastlier face to the world.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-intoxication-of-power-via-simpsons.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-3959577266122476423Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:59:00 +00002015-06-10T18:51:42.390+01:00David CameronEU referendumLabourLabour leadership contest 2015politicsToriesTrying to out bonehead each other.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Why in the name of all that is fucking holy <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/09/andy-burnham-jeered-labour-leadership-hustings-benefits-cap">is the Labour party holding leadership hustings</a>, not only when parliament is sitting, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/09/pm-accused-rig-eu-referendum-government-propaganda">but when a bill as important as the EU referendum act</a> is being debated and voted on?&nbsp; Why are so many hustings taking place at all when the vote does not take place for another 9 weeks?&nbsp; Why can the party seemingly not make up its mind as to whether it should have a short or a long contest, and instead apparently wants to have both?&nbsp; Is it down to how it's far too obvious and therefore far too silly a concept for the opposition party to um, act as an opposition when the government shows just how laughably split it is over Europe?<br /><br />All these questions and frankly dozens more pass through my head as the two main political parties in this country try to out bonehead each other.&nbsp; The most sensible time for <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/09/labours-leadership-race-nominations-deadline-looms">Labour to conduct its leadership election would</a> be during the parliamentary recess.&nbsp; Let everyone go on holiday for two weeks and then spend the next month debating, husting, rutting and all the rest of it to their little hearts' content.&nbsp; The leader will be ready for when parliament returns, giving them time to work on their first conference speech, a conference vital for the party in all sorts of ways.&nbsp; It needs to be about what the new leader, whoever he or she turns out to be stands for, and what the Labour party under their leadership will represent.&nbsp; It needs to be about how the party rebuilds itself and how it can win back the support of those it has lost in every corner of the country.&nbsp; It needs to be about how the party can once again learn to listen rather than just waiting for its chance to speak.<br /><br />Why the hustings can't then wait till the recess don't ask me.&nbsp; Apparently it was necessary for the 5 contenders, who might shortly become 3 should neither Mary Creagh or Jeremy Corbyn manage to win the ludicrous 35 nominations needed from MPs <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/jun/09/boris-johnson-hosts-his-lbc-ask-boris-phone-in-politics-live">to be able to stand to journey to Dublin for the GMB conference on a Tuesday in June</a>, just to deliver mostly the same answers as they've given since the mauling the party received at the ballot box just over a month ago.&nbsp; The differences between Burnham, Cooper, Kendall and Creagh are almost entirely cosmetic when it comes down to it, it's just <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/09/liz-kendall-labour-leadership-ballot">Kendall has been branded the "moderniser"</a>, and you don't want to be against modernity do you, while Burnham and Cooper are more the "continuity" candidates.<br /><br />At least today all 5 agreed <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/jun/09/boris-johnson-hosts-his-lbc-ask-boris-phone-in-politics-live#block-5576f18be4b06840f081a233">the manifesto wasn't too left-wing</a>.&nbsp; Only Burnham and Corbyn had anything positive to say about it, mind.&nbsp; Not that any of the 3 who can win have as yet given the slightest indication they <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/05/a-return-to-may-7th-and-everything.html">understand just how massive the challenges facing the party are</a>, even if they have moved away from the more out there reasons they at first gave for why the party lost.&nbsp; If I have any sort of preference, it's for Kendall, and for entirely personal and spiteful reasons.&nbsp; Should Kendall win, I'll no longer have to feel as though I should practice what I preach, as the party will have abandoned me just as other luvvies have said when decamping.&nbsp; It'll also be quite something to see how those on the right of the party explain it when Labour loses just as miserably, if not more so in 5 years.<br /><br />Labour's various problems with reality are nonetheless as nothing when it comes to the Tories and their inexorable delusions over Europe.&nbsp; Here we are, barely a month after <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32652606">Cameron's "sweetest victory"</a>, and he already <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/08/david-cameron-u-turn-britains-eu-membership-referendum">can't so much as rely on the support of his own cabinet ministers</a> when it comes to his ability to negotiate a "better" deal for us in the EU.&nbsp; There he was, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/08/david-cameron-tory-ministers-face-sack-eu-exit">imagining he could bounce those who owe him for still having their jobs</a> into supporting a yes to stay in vote come what may, only for a mutiny to break out within minutes.&nbsp; No, no, no said Dave, you idiots in the press got the wrong end of the stick; I only meant ministers would be expected to support me during the negotiation process.&nbsp; Which is why a minister was put up on the Today programme to defend the principle of his colleagues needing to supporting the government line come the referendum, obviously.<br /><br />Arguing for the exit is then to be the equivalent of an issue of conscience, a dispensation only usually extended to ministers when it comes to votes where the influence of religious faith rears its head.&nbsp; To your <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/shortcuts/2015/jun/08/meet-new-bastards-tories-50-strong-awkward-squad-conservatives-for-britain">"Conservatives for Britain"</a> and those within the cabinet who will ally with the no lobby when the time comes, to get out of the EU is a question of morals, to which to transgress against is to deny theological teaching.&nbsp; Brussels may as well be the antichrist, the whore of Babylon, Jezebel herself.&nbsp; To the more deranged, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33067157">like Bill Cash</a>, nothing less than a rewriting of history is necessary, nor will do.&nbsp; We fought and died in two world wars for our parliament, our democracy, not their parliament, not their democracy.&nbsp; We saved Europe from itself.&nbsp; Churchill was one of the first to come up with this <a href="http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/astonish.html">mad little idea called a United States of Europe</a>, but he never imagined Britain as being a part of it, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10792773/Britain-would-be-better-off-without-the-EUs-ever-closer-union.html">let alone drawn into "ever closer union"</a>.<br /><br />Just as with Tory objections to the European Convention on Human Rights/the Human Rights Act, so much of the argument is not with the institutions themselves as the way the statutes are interpreted.&nbsp; We are clearly not going to be any part of an ever closer union when we are outside of the Eurozone and have no intention of joining it, and yet we must have "explicit recognition" of our opposition and "explicit protection" of our interests.&nbsp; The rest of Europe meanwhile sighs and snorts at the haughtiness and self-importance on display, but will most likely agree to something that will allow Cameron to claim his renegotiation has been successful.&nbsp; He clearly won't get any change on free movement, but probably will get something on the payment of in-work benefits to migrants, and something he can say does mean we're exempt from the "ever closer union".&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/02/britain-eu-veto-opt-out-david-cameron">Germany could of course drive a hard bargain</a> if it wanted, asking for something in return like the removal of the veto.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2011/12/in-europe-without-influence.html">The veto is worthless in any case</a>, as Cameron's previous wielding of it showed, but then so many of the complaints about the EU are imaginary that it doesn't really matter.<br /><br />Essentially, what the out right this instant people care about the most, beyond the tiny few who really are convinced we've sold away our sovereignty, are things like the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/maximum-weekly-working-hours/overview">working time directive</a>, which helps ensure student doctors who would otherwise work 72 hour shifts don't kill more patients than they save.&nbsp; I exaggerate, but only slightly.&nbsp; They seem to imagine we'd have all the benefits of the single market with none of the drawbacks, only we'd need to negotiate a better deal than either <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway%E2%80%93European_Union_relations">Norway</a> or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland%E2%80%93European_Union_relations">Switzerland</a>, as both are subject to the same free movement of people rules as members; indeed, both are also signed up to the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Area">Schengen agreement</a> we opted out of.&nbsp; That we'd be Norway without the oil and Switzerland without the banking secrecy and skiing seems of little concern, unless the point is to turn London fully into an offshore city state where the rich and famous can hide their loot and come and go as they please.<br /><br />Cameron it has to be remembered <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2013/05/cameron-hostage-to-fortune.html">gave in to these monomaniacs in the hope</a> of fending off UKIP and buying himself some time.&nbsp; As it was he was saved by the collapse of the Lib Dems, not UKIP defectors returning home.&nbsp; All it's done is encouraged the headbangers, as it was always going to; already we've seen in the debate today the excuses being made should the vote not go their way, with the complaints about <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/11663482/EU-referendum-is-rigged-against-exit-former-Tory-cabinet-ministers-warn.html">the usual period of purdah prior to elections</a> not applying.&nbsp; This is despite EU residents being denied a vote, as apparently what they think of all this is irrelevant.&nbsp; Now sacrificed has been unity within the cabinet itself, a sign as sure as any of a government destined to be torn apart by the obsessions of the few rather than the many.<br /><br />According to Philip Hammond in the Commons, "an entire generation" has been denied the chance to express their view on our relationship with Europe.&nbsp; Merely voting for parties that are pro-EU doesn't count.&nbsp; Should said entire generation come the plebiscite decide by a 55 to 45% margin we're better off in, there's no reason to think we won't be voting again come 2022, 2027, just as the Scottish referendum has made a repeat more rather than less likely.&nbsp; Another referendum on electoral reform though, to deal with how the votes of nearly 7.5 million people, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2015/results">the combined total of UKIP, Green and Lib Dem support</a>, added up to 10 MPs, while the 1.5 million votes for the SNP added up to 56?&nbsp; That truly could be a generation away.<br /></span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/trying-to-out-bonehead-each-other.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-6004829851148492691Mon, 08 Jun 2015 21:48:00 +00002015-06-09T15:17:25.177+01:00Alastair CampbellCharles Kennedyforeign policyIraqJon SnowpoliticsTony BlairIraq and othering.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><a href="http://www.alastaircampbell.org/blog/2015/06/02/charles-kennedy-a-lovely-man-a-talented-politician-a-great-friend-with-a-shared-enemy/">In his otherwise fine tribute to Charles Kennedy</a> (only Steve Bell's <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2015/jun/02/steve-bell-on-charles-kennedy-cartoon">beautifully elegiac and moving watercolour</a> was finer), Alastair Campbell couldn't help but get a dig in at those whom, when it comes to him and Our Tone, can't see beyond Iraq: </span><br /><blockquote class="tr_bq"><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><i><b>Charles knew that it was possible to disagree with people without constantly feeling the need to condemn them as lacking in integrity or values; though he was not averse to making a few cracks about historic events down the road in Glencoe.</b></i></span></blockquote><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><br />And it's true, it's perfectly possible to disagree with someone's politics without disliking them as a person; there are plenty of marriages and partnerships that are testament to that.&nbsp; Equally though, it's fair to say most of us are happiest and most comfortable among those who think the same way, or we at least believe do so.&nbsp; Where the line becomes more blurred is when we get into the territory of othering; when we ascribe motives to our opponents that we might believe they have when they do not.&nbsp; It's far more difficult to remain on friendly terms with someone who thinks the worst and isn't backward in coming forward with such accusations.&nbsp; Both left and right do this, regardless of how the right often complains the left is more susceptible to othering; while not the best example, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/12/polls-shy-tories-left-conservatives">Lionel Shriver wrote in the Graun</a> after the election that the reason there are "shy Tories" is because of how successful the left apparently is at portraying those on the centre-right as being heartless monsters.<br /><br />You do though have to wonder if Campbell is yet again protesting too much.&nbsp; Very few now will claim, can claim, that Blair's motives in going to war in Iraq were cynical.&nbsp; He fervently believed, and indeed still does believe that getting rid of Saddam was the right thing to do.&nbsp; The way the case for war was presented was cynical, no doubt about it, although this again is not to say that Blair did not truly believe that Iraq had a WMD programme, was in breach of UN resolutions and so war could be justified on those grounds.&nbsp; How he came to believe that is again open to question, but that he genuinely believed it was the case is not in doubt.&nbsp; Blair's crisis of confidence in mid-2004, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/7337883/Tony-Blair-considered-resigning-in-wake-of-Iraq-war.html">when he came extremely close to resigning</a> such was the pressure over the failure to find the missing WMD coupled with the death of Dr David Kelly is testament to that.<br /><br />Belief is key to understanding Blair.&nbsp; The former prime minister's every move is a mess of contradictions, just as his ideology, or rather lack of it always was: Blair believes, therefore he is.&nbsp; He has no objection to supporting dictators or autocrats (<a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120691/tony-blair-does-pr-repressive-azerbaijan-kazakhstan-autocracies">and taking their money</a>) every bit as oppressive as Saddam was, at least in his later years when under sanctions, so long as they are supportive of the West.&nbsp; He is deeply opposed to Islamism, and would rather states <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2014/04/a-dangerous-melanie-phillips.html">like Egypt remain under the yoke of one man</a> than become exceptionally messy democracies which elect the likes of the Muslim Brotherhood.&nbsp; Yet he's never voiced any concerns about the AKP in Turkey, perhaps because, err, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/jun/08/turkey-election-2015-ruling-party-loses-majority-as-pro-kurdish-hdp-gains-rolling-report">until the weekend it looked as though Erdogan</a> was becoming the very kind of ruler he's fond of.&nbsp; Blair isn't oblivious to his idiosyncrasies, or to just how much of a disaster his support for the Iraq war has been; he can and has seen it.&nbsp; It just hasn't altered his belief that he was, is right regardless.<br /><br />With Campbell there is no such belief.&nbsp; You can't be an alcoholic, a depressive, as Campbell is, and believe so wholly in yourself, in everything you do, and project it so consistently.&nbsp; Campbell famously said "we don't do God", whereas with Blair it's difficult to know which God he believes in the most, himself or Jehovah.&nbsp; Unlike Blair, Campbell has also never given so much as the slightest inkling that he believed the war in Iraq was the right thing to do.&nbsp; Where belief is key to understanding Blair, key to understanding Campbell is loyalty.&nbsp; On the day Robert Maxwell fell off his boat, taking the Mirror pension fund with him, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2001/nov/05/labour.uk">Campbell was the one punching Michael White</a> for making a Cap'n Bob-bob-bob joke.&nbsp; Likewise, Campbell was so loyal to Blair that he became a liability.&nbsp; Who knows <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2015/01/and-were-back-in-room.html">what the Chilcot inquiry will eventually conclude</a> about dodgy dossiers and all the rest of it, but Campbell served his master regardless of whether he thought he was right or not.&nbsp; Whether Campbell secretly advised Blair that the war thing was all a bit loopy-loo we don't know.&nbsp; Perhaps he did.&nbsp; Perhaps he didn't.&nbsp; Regardless, he did what he was employed to.<br /><br />The vast majority of us do the same, albeit usually on far less serious matters.&nbsp; We might think our bosses are idiots, but it's rare we say that to their faces, at least if we want to remain employed.&nbsp; We might advise them their strategy or way of thinking is wrong, but we carry on regardless if they disagree.&nbsp; Neither Blair or Campbell could have foreseen what a disaster Iraq would turn out to be; they were certainly warned civil war was a possibility, as they were that it would foment terrorism and potentially bring it to these shores.&nbsp; No one came close to predicting it would lead to the rise of a terrorist group that would look to usurp al-Qaida, that would straddle both Iraq and Syria and be so adept at propagandising that British schoolgirls would be attracted to its cause.&nbsp; They could though have foreseen the instability that would erupt from the abandonment of any plan for the aftermath, that a country which had already been bombed by the US and the UK for 12 years prior to the invasion wouldn't with open arms welcome their liberators, that there is no telling what forces you will stir up by removing completely the existing governing structure and starting again, a pattern we've seen repeated in Libya.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/channel-4s-jon-snow-attacked-for-calling-iraq-foreign-minister-tariq-aziz-a-nice-guy-10301432.html">When Jon Snow then says the Tariq Aziz he knew was a "nice guy"</a>, he's no doubt telling the truth.&nbsp; Plenty of dictatorships have a softer face, that suggests reform could be possible, and like Aziz did, provide some representation for a minority group.&nbsp; Aziz might not have been responsible principally for any of the oppression that either the Kurds or the Shia in Iraq suffered either; Jalal Talabani, the Kurdish Iraqi president, refused to sign the warrant for his execution.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/05/tariq-aziz">As the obituaries have made clear however</a>, he was involved in the decisions to go to war with Iran and then invade Kuwait.&nbsp; He most certainly had blood on his hands.&nbsp; So too, without question, does Tony Blair.&nbsp; Does the fact Blair was elected whereas Aziz never was make a difference?&nbsp; Do Aziz's initial politics, his support for Arab nationalism, help us understand how he came to be where he was and how he justified it to himself?&nbsp; Does the fact he was the softer face of one of the most destructive dictatorships in the region in fact make him a worse person?<br /><br />Just as it is possible to disagree with someone without questioning or condemning their integrity or values, it is possible to think worse of someone precisely because their integrity or values are or seem to be pure.&nbsp; Blair continues to be a malign influence on the world stage because his black and white view of the world is so dangerous, because he has learned nothing from the war he still believes was the right thing to do.&nbsp; Campbell is a fascinating figure and invites such hostility precisely because of his success and his contrasting ability to claim white is in fact black, so long as it's in the interests of who he's working for.&nbsp; Worse, I might posit, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/g2/story/0,3604,945381,00.html">are those commentators</a> who take advantage of the slightest opportunity <a href="http://www.instituteofopinion.com/2013/04/liberal-hawks-where-are-they-now/">to push their lost cause</a>, who in the face of all the evidence even <a href="https://twitter.com/daaronovitch/status/601139914856599553">now argue for more of the same</a>.&nbsp; Campbell, like Aziz, might be a nice guy when you get to know him, as Charles Kennedy, a more than decent judge of character felt.&nbsp; The rest of us can only judge based on the face those like Campbell present to the world.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/iraq-and-othering.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-2014263147944047537Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:14:00 +00002015-06-05T12:14:41.949+01:00drum and bassdubstepmiscellanymusicnon-politicsyoutube video postsControlled chaos.<center><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_fs5O_6beBk" width="480"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gvhQydwewmM" width="480"></iframe></center>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/controlled-chaos.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-5317739174796014929Thu, 04 Jun 2015 19:07:00 +00002015-06-04T20:07:52.661+01:00Bherlin GildoCrown Prosecution Serviceintelligence agenciesjihadistspoliticssecurity servicesSyriaterrorismHelping jihadists in Syria while still prosecuting those who come back? No, we wouldn't do that.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Speaking as we were of the deficiencies of the Crown Prosecution Service, it would be remiss not to mention the collapse on Monday of <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/01/trial-swedish-man-accused-terrorism-offences-collapse-bherlin-gildo">the about to start terrorism trial of</a> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3105884/Terror-suspect-Bherlin-Gildo-freed-intelligence-services-refuse-hand-evidence.html">Swedish national Bherlin Gildo</a>.&nbsp; Precisely what circumstances were behind the arrest of Gildo, who was only in the country to get a connecting flight to Manila, are opaque to begin with.&nbsp; Stopped at <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/03/swedish-national-arrested-heathrow-terror-offences">Heathrow under schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act</a>, he was charged with attending a terrorist training camp in Syria, as well as having in his possession information likely to be useful for terrorism.&nbsp; And indeed, Gildo made no attempt to deny he had been in Syria, fighting alongside the al-Nusra Front, al-Qaida's affiliate in the country.&nbsp; He hardly could when <a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&amp;sl=sv&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fgudmundson.blogspot.co.uk%2F2012%2F12%2Fsvensk-jihadist-poserar-med-manniskolik.html">like so many other jihadis he was keen on posing for the camera</a>, including with dead bodies.<br /><br />Surely then another open and shut case.&nbsp; Except Gildo's defence had the bright idea of bothering to put some work in for their client, and presented evidence <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line">mainly in the form of news reports</a> on how the intelligence agencies had been secretly training and supplying weapons to armed groups in Syria.&nbsp; The government has also recogised the <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2012/11/neither-one-thing-nor-other.html">Syrian opposition "as the sole legitimate representative"</a> of the Syrian people, despite how the Syrian opposition mainly consists of a tiny and ever dwindling number of so-called moderates and a complete mess of Islamists of various hues, from the more radical than Hamas variety to our pals in Islamic State.<br /><br />You might then have expected the prosecution to dismiss the notion the UK government had been in any way helping out a group affiliated to al-Qaida, or even the non-moderate opposition as a whole.&nbsp; If they refused to, or didn't disclose the information requested by the defence, that would be a tacit admission that we haven't the foggiest idea where the "non-lethal" materiel we do know has been provided has gone, let alone the alleged shipments of weapons, wouldn't it?&nbsp; It would seem so, and yet rather than dispel such an absurd notion, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11644227/Old-Bailey-trial-of-terror-suspect-collapses-after-security-services-refuse-to-say-who-they-helped-in-Syria.html">the prosecution instead dropped the case</a>.<br /><br />Fairly apparent is that the arrest of Gildo was a result of dealings between the authorities and the Swedish intelligence agencies.&nbsp; Gildo returned home with the apparent help of the Swedes, where there have been no prosecutions of those who have gone to fight in the country.&nbsp; Whether he broke an agreement he had with them, or terminated the mutual relationship they believed to have developed, it's difficult to see precisely why he would have been stop and arrested here, various jihadist propaganda found on his laptop or not, unless it was as a favour on the part of MI5.&nbsp; They clearly didn't expect Gildo to end up being represented by the ever tenacious Gareth Peirce, nor that something done for reasons we'll never know could have potentially exposed the activities of MI6 in providing support to the Syrian rebels.&lt;<br /><br />The surprise is that in none of the previous prosecutions of those who've travelled to Syria to fight was a similar defence attempted.&nbsp; The vast majority have involved Islamic State, which the West has never directly backed, although our allies in the Middle East may well have done, but this wasn't the case at the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30213771">trial of the Nawaz brothers.</a>&nbsp; Not only did neither of the brothers actually take part in fighting, staying only at a training camp for a month, they joined a group that became part of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Front_%28Syria%29">Islamic Front</a>, a jihadist but opposed to Islamic State coalition of various factions.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Despite the Crown Prosecution Service saying the dropping of the Gildo case <a href="http://www.expressandstar.com/news/uk-news/2015/06/01/terror-case-against-swede-collapses/">will have no bearing on other prosecutions</a> relating to Syria, it surely provides the Nawaz brothers with a line of appeal: if the government cannot guarantee it is not providing support to groups like the Islamic Front, then surely their conviction is unsafe.&nbsp; Considering it refused to do so in a case involving al-Nusra, which is a specifically proscribed organisation, it hardly seems likely to be able to do with Junud al-Sham.&nbsp; As with policy on Syria as a whole, what an utter mess, and one entirely of our own making.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/helping-jihadists-in-syria-while-still.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-2670076531708361826Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:39:00 +00002015-06-04T00:05:52.724+01:00abuses by tabloidsAndy CoulsonDaily Mirrordark artsNews InternationalNews of the Worldphone hackingPiers MorganpoliticsTommy SheridanCoulson: merely a liar, not a perjurer.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-32931204">Andy Coulson is a liar</a>.&nbsp; Indeed, he is not just your simple, run of the mill, garden liar, telling his wife that hideous dress really does look fabulous, continuing to maintain that ex-lover Rebekah Brooks is innocent, etc.&nbsp; He has repeatedly lied under oath.&nbsp; <a href="http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2012/07/leveson-and-crumbling-of-empires.html">He lied under oath at the phone hacking trial</a>, before finally the biggest lie of them all, that he had no knowledge of hacking whatsoever and it had all been conducted, authorised and paid for by his underlings collapsed in his third day in the witness box.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/10770259/Andy-Coulson-I-listened-to-hacked-David-Blunkett-voicemails-into-affair.html">Yes, he had listened to recordings</a> of then home secretary David Blunkett's voicemails as played to him by chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck, but he didn't know such a thing was illegal and he immediately put a stop to such a disgusting abuse of a secretary of state's privacy, honest injun.<br /><br />The jury saw through it, as did everyone else.&nbsp; Coulson's peformance at the Old Bailey was not however his first instance of telling the most outrageous of lies while under oath.&nbsp; Called by Tommy Sheridan at the Scottish politician's own perjury trial, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/09/andy-coulson-phone-hacking-sheridan">Coulson denied having any knowledge whatsoever of Glenn Mulcaire</a>, the News of the World's private detective phone hacker-in-chief.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2010/12/coulson-in-knowing-nothing-shocker.html">At the time I asked if there had ever been an instance</a> of someone facing a charge of perjury as a consequence of giving evidence at a perjury trial, and lo, so did it come to pass.&nbsp; The case was repeatedly delayed, first by all the investigations in England into phone hacking, then by the election, lest the potential conviction of the prime minister's former head of communications for perjury while still in his employ have any desperately unfair impact on the result, <a href="https://www.byline.com/project/8/article/45">but did eventually begin three weeks ago</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/03/andy-coulson-cleared-of-perjury-in-scottish-court">Coulson's acquittal today</a>, which is of a piece with the aforementioned acquittal of Rebekah Brooks and many of the Sun journalists on charges of misconduct in public office, is not that surprising given the Scottish definition of precisely what perjury is.&nbsp; What is surprising is that as with so many of these cases, the prosecution itself was unutterably lacking.&nbsp; The Crown had over four years to get its case against Coulson in order, or rather, potentially, to realise that it didn't have one despite the blatancy of Coulson's untruths.&nbsp; At every point Lord Burns, the presiding judge, appears to have given the Crown the benefit of the doubt: the case proceeded despite Coulson's defence lawyer, <a href="https://www.byline.com/project/8/article/70">Murdo MacLeod QC advancing the exact same arguments that belatedly saw his client acquitted</a> in closed court before the trial began.&nbsp; Burns let the prosecution make its case, then decided that it had indeed completely failed to prove that Coulson's evidence in Sheridan's perjury trial had been relevant to his conviction.&nbsp; In fact, it didn't really even begin to do so.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=c377daa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7">As Burns summed up</a>, in Scotland at least, <a href="http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/Upload/Documents/HMAvAndrewCoulsonjuryexplanation030615.pdf">"not every lie amounts to perjury"</a> (PDF) .&nbsp; Despite what some were quick to claim, Coulson was not cleared of lying under oath.&nbsp; He without a shadow of a doubt <a href="https://www.byline.com/project/8/article/66">did lie under cross-examination from Tommy Sheridan</a>.&nbsp; That Coulson was prepared to risk not just his own career but also that of the man he chose to serve by doing so is a measure of his hubris and eventual nemesis.&nbsp; His lies were not however integral to Sheridan being found guilty; despite Sheridan advancing the claim that he had been hacked by the News of the World, evidence given by a Metropolitan police officer contradicted the notion.&nbsp; Sheridan did indeed feature in one of Glenn Mulcaire's notebooks, filled with the phone numbers and PIN codes of so many other phone hacking victims, but no further evidence was discovered to prove Sheridan was among them.&nbsp; Sheridan in his summing up painted his calling of Coulson as potentially irrelevant, but justified it as necessary as part of "other issues that have to be considered, not for you, but other issues…about conduct in public life, about power about who can do things and who can break the law and get away with it". He also argued it was "a public service and a public duty to try and expose wrongdoing".<br /><br />The Crown was rather in a bind.&nbsp;<a href="http://tommyslawyer.co.uk/hma-v-coulson-scottish-crown-sabotages-prosecution/"> It could hardly call Sheridan to expand on precisely</a> what his intentions were and why in fact his questioning and Coulson's answers were relevant to the conviction.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/03/andy-coulson-perjury-trial-echoes-hacking-scandal-sheridan-case">As the Graun points out</a>, it was the Crown's case in the original trial that any use of the dark arts against Sheridan, of which there hadn't been any anyway, was irrelevant.&nbsp; To then admit that, err, perhaps there had been would be a contradiction too far and provide <a href="http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9mSs3C0fm9VuUUAEwhLBQx.;_ylu=X3oDMTEyNzA1cjE1BGNvbG8DaXIyBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQjAyOTRfMQRzZWMDc3I-/RV=2/RE=1433399093/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.bbc.co.uk%2fnews%2fuk-scotland-28662098/RK=0/RS=I31RVjgahn7Sv.HPzfVGDGLqYNA-">further ammunition to the review of his conviction</a>.&nbsp; Incompetence does still rear its head: Burns was not given the rulings made prior to and during the Sheridan trial over the admissibility of hacking evidence, which deemed it was relevant.&nbsp; And while Sheridan may well not have been hacked, his associate Joan McAlpine definitely was.&nbsp; There's also the question, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/apr/28/lord-janner-alleged-victims-formal-review-dpp-decision-not-to-prosecute-child-abuse-claims">as raised over the non-prosecution of Lord Janner</a>, of whether it should have been left up to the jury to decide if they felt Coulson's evidence had been relevant.<br /><br />Lord Burns' highlighting of the Scottish law on perjury does nonetheless all but suggest that north of the border the oath isn't to be taken literally.&nbsp; Apparently you only need tell the truth up to a point; juries can distinguish between evidence from a witness that is clearly fanciful while still accepting other things they say as fact, as Burns writes.&nbsp; It's quite true that if everyone who lied under oath was prosecuted the courts would do little else, and yet it seems perverse that a judge can accept that someone who was in such a position of authority and power as Coulson can treat the oath with contempt and walk free, claiming vindication no less.<br /><br />What matters however is the law, and regardless of whether or not the case was pursued competently or with total dedication, with perjury being so narrowly defined it was always going to be difficult to achieve a conviction.&nbsp; The same could be said of many of the prosecutions of Sun journalists in England, which have in the main seen the journalists acquitted while their sources, disgracefully, <a href="https://www.byline.com/project/8/article/43">have often been convicted and imprisoned</a>.&nbsp; These prosecutions, which are all the more questionable after a <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/mar/31/crown-prosecution-service-to-review-charges-under-operation-elveden">Court of Appeal ruling that a judge had</a> misdirected the jury in one trial, resulted from the handing over to the Met of a massive cache of internal documentation, as provided by News Corp's Management Standards Committee.&nbsp; If the purpose, as critics have long suspected, was to focus attention on the misdeeds of individual journalists rather than on those commissioning their stories and paying their wages, then it seems to have gone entirely according to plan.<br /><br />Nor does the performance of the CPS inspire confidence should charges eventually be forthcoming <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/21/mirror-phone-hacking-drove-celebrities-to-drink-paranoia-and-hell">over the phone hacking at the Mirror group of newspapers</a>.&nbsp; Just as News International maintained its "one lone reporter" line until it could no longer do so, such was the weight of evidence, so too Trinity Mirror denied any wrongdoing until finally the logjam was broken by the case brought by a group of celebrities.&nbsp; Former chief executive Sly Bailey <a href="https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/trinity-mirror-sly-bailey-insists-no-evidence-of-phone-hacking-leveson-inquiry/s2/a547496/">almost certainly lied to the Leveson inquiry</a>, while current CEO Simon Fox, who previously took HMV to the brink of collapse, claimed once they were convinced hacking <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/24/trinity-mirror-simon-fox-hacking">had taken place they acted</a>.&nbsp; Mr Justice Mann in fact had to order the company to make clear exactly what it was it was admitting to last September, <a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2015/1482.html#para35">rather than just in the "general terms" it had</a>.&nbsp; His ruling also made clear that he accepted the evidence of James Hipwell (one of those imprisoned following the City Slickers affair) on hacking at the Daily Mirror, and how it "implicates the newspaper at levels above the journalists investigating the stories".&nbsp; Let's hope Alison Saunders and friends have more success with Piers Morgan than her predecessor did with Rebekah Brooks, eh?</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/coulson-merely-liar-not-perjurer.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-3768519731728200427Tue, 02 Jun 2015 20:41:00 +00002015-06-03T17:52:29.953+01:00Charles KennedyLiberal Democratsmedia analysismedia stupiditymockeryobituariespoliticsThe Charles Kennedy I didn't know.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">In common with most of my fellow journalists commissioned to write about him following his untimely death, I never actually met Charles "Charlie" Kennedy, as he was universally known to all us political commentators.&nbsp; A fearsomely tall man, muscularly built and with a booming voice, you most certainly would have seen him coming.</span><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;"><br />And yet from such low beginnings did this titan of Liberal politics rise to lead his merry band into the coveted third party position it wishes it still retained.&nbsp; Born on the banks of Loch Lochbaer to parents from parts unknown, he fought against the twin barriers of being ginger and Scottish from the start.&nbsp; Known as "Charlie" at school, he disdained the local custom of hanging around the local newsagents swigging from a bottle of Buckfast, and instead preferred to attend debates at the local corn exchange, where he first gained his liking for a wee dram or 13.&nbsp; It was also here that he became known as something of a bruiser, objecting to a particular point of view from the local son of the manse, a certain Alex Ferguson, by giving him a firm punch on the bottom.&nbsp; It was an incident that led to Ferguson never speaking to Chaz again, and a lifetime ban from Old Trafford.<br /><br />Like so many young people, Chalkie had to leave school on finishing exams.&nbsp; Despite an indifferent academic career up until that point, he was accepted by Glasgow University to read ancient Aramaic, a choice that seemed strange to everyone who knew him at that point as "Bluff" Charlie.&nbsp; He nonetheless excelled, not only at his studies but also at anything he seemingly turned his hand to: Chattanooga swiftly became president of the student union, war correspondent for the Scotsman and also won the Watney's Red Barrel Have I Gone Blind Yet? championship 1981.&nbsp; He likewise gained notoriety for his ability to seduce both male and female contemporaries, such was the raw animal magnetism he radiated at this stage in his life.&nbsp; Later described as the Scottish Lynn Barber, it is estimated he slept with over 6,000 people in his first term alone.<br /><br />Although offered the then vacant role of James Bond by MGM, Chaffinch knew his future lay in politics.&nbsp; Unexpectedly winning the seat of Morose, Skye and Balamory at the first attempt for the nascent Dr Death Nuclear Doom party in 1983, he joined fellow future household names such as Geoffrey Dickens, Robert Kilroy-Silk and Gyles Brandreth at Westminster.&nbsp; Such associations understandably led to the much too young Chappaquiddick taking solace in the bottle, to which he invariably returned throughout his parliamentary career.&nbsp; As however by the standards of the time his drinking was considered to be social, only requiring medical intervention 4 times over the space of 5 years, it was little remarked upon.<br /><br />Kennedy was by this point rising in the estimation of the Liberal Democrat party leadership, as the David Owen-led Doom party had dissolved into.&nbsp; Charlie further built public recognition by appearing on a number of popular television shows, including That's My Dog, Supermarket Sweep, Bullseye and most notably, Have I Got News for You?, where he sat alongside Paul Merton trying to get a word in edgeways.&nbsp; Such performances made him a natural frontrunner for the Lib Dem leadership after the sudden death of Paddy Ashdown in a tragic hat-swallowing stunt, winning the contest by a landslide, receiving 29 votes out of 30 in the membership ballot.<br /><br />The great turning point in Charlie's political journey occurred with his decision to oppose the Iraq war.&nbsp; Advised against rocking the boat from both within and outside his party, as well as warned by friend Alastair Campbell to avoid walking alone in woodland or up mountains, he ignored all such entreaties, going as far as to attend the 25 million strong 15th Feb 2003 protest in London.&nbsp; He electrified the crowd with his "I don't think this war thing's a good idea, on the whole" oratory, and for a moment "Chaz-mania" swept the country.&nbsp; Two years later he led his party to its best ever result in a general election, winning 62 seats in the Commons.<br /><br />His success was also to be his downfall.&nbsp; Impatient, ambitious colleagues within the party, concerned that his drinking would eventually cause it incalculable damage briefed extensively against him.&nbsp; A last ditch effort by Kennedy to flush out his opponents in a leadership contest lasted all of a day before he resigned and accepted he would not stand again.&nbsp; His successor, the 154-year-old Methuselah Campbell, himself only lasted 18 months in the role before he was smothered by Nicholas "Nick" Clegg.<br /><br />Chaz returned to the wilderness, an embittered if still witty and well-loved figure, and was one of only three others in the party with the foresight to abstain on the vote on whether to go into government with the Conservatives in 2010.&nbsp; His refusal to endorse the coalition did not save him from the great Sturgeon surge of 2015, losing not only his seat but also we must speculate in the most tasteless way possible much else besides.&nbsp; In detail we journalists and <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/02/charles-kennedy-celia-munro-confidante-tragedies-alcoholism">his now talkative "confidantes" must discuss</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/caronmlindsay/status/605760646060351489">his demons</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/caronmlindsay/status/605760844627095552">and</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/caronmlindsay/status/605761299797188608">flaws</a>, rather than wonder precisely how it was such a thoroughly decent man could be treated so shoddily and with such little respect by those around him who claimed to be his friends.&nbsp; A party leader who was human enough to admit to a drink problem despite never being caught in public the worse for wear and yet was still punished for it?&nbsp; Certainly, we shall not see his like again.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-charles-kennedy-i-didnt-know.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-3806396139911286131Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:27:00 +00002015-06-02T18:05:01.334+01:00corruptionEnglandFIFAfootballpoliticsQatarSepp BlattersportCorruption, Fifa and humbug.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">When it comes down to it, there's nothing that warms my cold, cynical heart as much as some good old fashioned humbuggery.&nbsp; Watching the Eurovision song contest a couple of Saturdays ago, the crowd had the temerity to boo as a summary of the points was given, Russia at that time being in the lead.&nbsp; I don't recall exactly what one of the presenters said, but it was along the lines of please don't bring politics into this especially when this year's theme is <a href="http://www.eurovision.tv/page/news?id=vienna_2015_slogan_revealed">"building bridges"</a>.&nbsp; Eurovision is of course as much about politics as it is a festival of camp and instantly forgettable songs, hence the only people you can ever remember winning it are Abba, Bucks Fizz, Dana International, Lordi and last year's sensation, Conchita Wurst.&nbsp; Every year the same countries vote for each other, and every year the same people get slightly pissy about how manifestly corrupt the whole thing is, then the next day they forget and the experience repeats when May rolls round again.<br /><br />We must then discuss the unfortunate problems at Fifa.&nbsp; Good lord did the media spend the back end of last week <a href="http://news.sky.com/story/1492953/sepp-blatter-wins-fifth-term-lets-go-fifa">in a state of incredibly amusing hysteria</a> <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/sepp-blatter/11641473/Sepp-Blatter-five-time-Fifa-president-is-the-Ernst-Stavro-Blofeld-of-global-football.html">at the brassneck of Sepp Blatter</a>, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_spot/2014/07/15/sepp_blatter_is_the_king_of_world_cup_jerks.html">the old rogue refusing to stand down</a> despite the rest of the board being <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/may/27/fifa-officials-world-cup-fraud-us-prosecutors">under suspension, arrest or having already pleaded guilty to being only slightly less crooked</a> than Robert Maxwell.&nbsp; He didn't stand down because he knew he had the support of enough delegates to hang on, at least for now: <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/31/fifa-sepp-blatter-champion-world-football-africa-asia">as Vivek Chaudhary goes against the grain in the Graun to point out</a>, Blatter has <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/may/28/sepp-blatter-fifa-africa-zambia">legitimately helped enough confederations in both Africa and Asia</a> to outvote the majority of European and Latin American countries that have now turned against him.&nbsp; Yes, there probably still is an element of graft in some of those dealings, but no one's managed as yet to find a trail of evidence leading back to Blatter himself, despite as it appears the best efforts of the Americans.<br /><br />The obvious cliché everyone reaches for in these circumstances is Casablanca, as so many find themselves, shocked, shocked, that there could possibly be corruption at play in the handing out of hosting rights to tournaments and multi-billion dollar marketing and advertising schemes.&nbsp; Oh, the newly appointed US attorney general Loretta Lynch wailed, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/05/27/how-watergate-helps-explain-how-the-u-s-can-prosecute-fifa-officials/?wpisrc=nl_pmpol&amp;wpmm=1">the kickbacks have "profoundly harmed a multitude of victims"</a>, not just the fans, but the "youth leagues and developing countries that should benefit from the revenue generated by the commercial rights these organizations hold".&nbsp; And you think, I'm sorry, when did youth leagues and developing countries benefit from any sporting extravaganza ever without something being wanted in return?&nbsp; It just doesn't happen, regardless of whether cash-stuffed brown envelopes are handed out or if less obvious if-you-scratch-my-back arrangements are the order of the day.&nbsp; The biggest legacy from the London Olympics is going to be <a href="http://uk.westfield.com/stratfordcity/">that fucking shopping mall</a> and <a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9374702/londons-real-olympic-legacy-paying-to-build-the-stadium-twice/">West Ham getting the stadium practically gratis</a>, which is very nice indeed for those captains of industry <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gold_%28businessman%29">Gold</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sullivan_%28publisher%29">Sullivan</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karren_Brady#Political_career">Baroness Brady of Knightsbridge</a>.<br /><br />Blatter's great mistake has been in not respecting Europe and especially England as the footballing superpowers they so clearly are.&nbsp; Letting Germany host in 2006 simply wasn't enough; few begrudged Japan and South Korea hosting in 2002, or the World Cup going to Africa in 2010, nor Brazil in 2014, despite it becoming ever clearer that the latter two were as reliant on bungs as the subsequent awards have been.&nbsp; Had Fifa been cleverer, they would have let our good selves host in 2018, rather than the visibly corrupt Russians.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2010/12/that-strange-feeling-of-deja-vu.html">Our bid was unbelievably parochial and self-obsessed</a>, yet it would have meant we could indulge in some good ol' football's coming home feel good crap instead of bitterly looking for excuses for why the damn Russians got it instead.&nbsp; Going a step further and choosing Qatar was just asking for it.&nbsp; It's one thing trying, as Sepp Blatter has always attempted, to push football beyond its heartlands of Europe and Latin America, and another to hand it to a country that gives kleptocracy a bad name.&nbsp; A country so tiny and has such extreme weather conditions that hundreds of <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2014/06/you-cant-shame-shameless.html">enslaved workers drop dead in the process of building the stadia</a>.&nbsp; Yes, this is going to be an incredible success, I can just feel it.<br /><br />More ludicrous still however <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jun/01/fifa-football-association-culture-secretary-john-whittingdale">has been the reaction of politicians</a> and the media, both of which know corruption, nepotism, patronage and abuses of power when they see them, and boy are they seeing them now.&nbsp; So absurd has the sense of moral superiority become that no one seems to have noticed that the apparent clean pair of hands standing against Blatter last week <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/may/29/fifa-presidential-election-who-is-prince-ali-bin-al-hussein-sepp-blatter-challenger">was the offspring of the Jordanian autocrat king</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Ali_bin_Hussein">trained at Sandhurst</a> along with all those other dictators in waiting, while just to mirror things up the president of the FA is none other than Prince William, clearly there on merit.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-32911782">Why oh why are the sponsors not taking a tougher line</a> has been one of the other cries, as though the likes of Visa and McDonalds could give a damn about a few days of bad publicity when in their minds it's <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/may/30/why-businesses-still-need-fifa-sponsorship">the brand exposure of a month of sport</a> that makes all the difference.&nbsp; This isn't like the News of the World, where a dying medium could be abandoned without a moment's thought.&nbsp; That, and as the <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/fifa-corruption-arrests-nike-reported-to-be-multinational-sportswear-company-at-centre-of-bribery-claims-over-brazil-shirt-deal-10282242.html">allegations against Nike and Brazil may well show</a>, they're just as ensnared in the dealings as the Fifa executives themselves.<br /><br />We should then <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/may/31/england-boycott-2018-world-cup-andy-burnham">be ready to boycott the 2018 World Cup</a>, just to show how truly disappointed we are.&nbsp; <a href="http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/media/images/83337000/gif/_83337004_sunfront1.gif">The Sun demands Uefa takes a firmer line on Blatter the "tyrant"</a>, as clearly it's implausible he didn't know what his underlings were up to, unlike, say Rupert Murdoch, or Rebekah Brooks.&nbsp; A jury cleared her on that score after all.&nbsp; There's also nothing to be concerned or wonder about in the <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2015/02/one-solution-to-scudamore-piracy.html">£5.14bn deal recently agreed between the Premier League and the broadcasters</a>, while UEFA looks set to water down the <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/may/18/uefa-relax-financial-fair-play-michel-platini">financial fair play rules on the basis</a> they could have the perverse effect of stopping other obscenely rich individuals from buying clubs and success along with it.&nbsp; Think there might have been something equally fishy about <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2014/02/the-collusion-and-complicity-of-ioc.html">the IOC giving the Winter Olympics to Sochi</a>, or how the IOC has just as strict rules as Fifa does on athletes daring to make political statements, which in turn are written into the contracts said athletes need to sign to get funding?&nbsp; Don't be silly.&nbsp; Or perhaps you might wonder if rather than Blatter being the embodiment of hubris and shamelessness, it could instead be politicians who have no qualms whatsoever about <a href="http://leftfootforward.org/2013/07/is-david-cameron-our-prime-minister-or-just-a-traveling-arms-merchant/">greasing the wheels when it comes to arms deals with dictators</a>, so long as it's good for UK plc.&nbsp; Who cares a fig for the people in Yemen, Bahrain or Syria?&nbsp; There's plenty more where they came from, just as the Qataris know there's plenty of Nepalese waiting for the chance to die in Doha.<br /><br />Money, like it or not, corrupts everything.&nbsp; We've seen it with the banks, where the barrel is completely rotten but nothing can be done lest it disintegrate entirely.&nbsp; The FA and the Premier League like to think of themselves as better than Fifa when they're just as lucre obsessed, and have figureheads only slightly less objectionable than a Swiss who doesn't know when to quit.&nbsp; We've seen it when not so long ago our then prime minister <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/index.php?q=/2008/07/victory-for-arms-dealers-kleptocrats.html">ordered a halt to a corruption investigation into the al-Yamanah weapons deal</a>, as the saintly Saudis had threatened to stop sharing intelligence with us if we didn't.&nbsp; Few kicked up a fuss beyond the usual suspects.<br />&nbsp;</span><br /><span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">Don't let us get our way at the old kicky ball game though, and just sit back and watch the repercussions fly.&nbsp; It might take years, we might not be personally responsible for the downfall when it comes, but it'll happen eventually.&nbsp; We might not win at Eurovision, be any good at football itself, or be much other than an inexorably fading nation with an incredibly high opinion of itself, but boy can we bear a grudge.</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/06/corruption-fifa-and-humbug.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-1313494261310638748Fri, 29 May 2015 10:58:00 +00002015-05-29T11:58:52.425+01:00dubstepfwdmiscellanymusicnon-politicsyoutube video postsJustice.<center><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iF-5tvaVmvk" width="480"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wkXuSd5lsGA" width="480"></iframe></center>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/05/justice.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-6327088643801258216Thu, 28 May 2015 17:00:00 +00002015-05-28T23:14:26.370+01:00film reviewfilmshorrornon-politicsV/H/SFilm review: V/H/S.<span style="font-family: georgia; font-size: 130%;">You know what I miss? Stupid, dumb, meat and potatoes slasher films.&nbsp; There's a killer, he kills people, mostly idiotic, annoying teenagers who may or may not have been in some way responsible for why he is the way he is, he does it in inventive, amusing ways, with or without wisecracks, until there's only one left, often a young woman, who manages to outsmart him.&nbsp; The door is left open for a sequel, it's all accomplished in 80-100 minutes, the colour theme of the film is vibrant rather than washed out brown/green, it's not lensed by a cinematographer with Saint Vitus' dance, and the editor refuses the temptation to make a bazillion cuts every nanosecond.<br /><br />Is that too much to ask?&nbsp; Is it really necessary for every other new "horror" film to be a part of the "found footage" genre, or to follow the lead set by the Paranormal Activity series of films, which seemingly exist only so as to make life even more miserable for the zero-hour, minimum wage slaves at the local World of Cine who have to pick up all the spilt popcorn between screenings?&nbsp; How is it I cannot think of a single horror film released in the past 5 years other than <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1959332/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1">American Mary</a> that I would watch again?&nbsp; I haven't seen It Follows, You're Next or As Above, So Below yet, all of which have had somewhat decent reviews, but I'm really not getting my hopes up for any of them.<br /><br />And so we come to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2105044/?ref_=rvi_tt">V/H/S</a>.&nbsp; Not only is it a found footage horror film, it's a portmanteau/anthology found footage horror film!&nbsp; That means there's not just 120 minutes of shaky, wibbly, constantly breaking up and decayed video to enjoy, but it's broken up into segments, sort of but not really tied together by the conceit of a gang of idiots breaking into a house to steal a tape, only they don't know what it is or what's on it.<br /><br />Except the film doesn't so much as bother to follow that conceit, as on a couple of occasions the next segment just begins without one of our intrepid heroes pressing play.&nbsp; Still, we're not really here for the plot, we're here for the spookums aren't we, so what does it matter?<br /><br />The film then opens with a sexual assault.&nbsp; Yep.&nbsp; Turns out our narrators, or at least guides have been making $50 a pop by grabbing women on the street and exposing their breasts, all the while filming their attacks.&nbsp; These are then posted online.&nbsp; They do this, needless to say, in broad daylight, without covering their faces.&nbsp; Only one of the group has found out they can make a whole heap more dough by just breaking into this one house and stealing a tape.&nbsp; They don't ask for any more details, they'll just know when they've found it.<br /><br />There is, of course, a dead guy in the house, in front of the obligatory stack of TVs and video machines.&nbsp; Which tape is it?&nbsp; Why do they not just gather up all the tapes and leave to review them elsewhere, as indeed one of the group suggests at one point, only to decide it's a fanciful idea?&nbsp; Why are they filming everything they're doing?&nbsp; Why I have not already switched this rubbish off?<br /><br />The leery, nasty tone set from the off continues in our first segment, Amateur Night, directed by David Bruckner.&nbsp; Our new group of 3 bros have only scored a pair of those spy glasses off the interwebs, the sort "used" by reality porn producers to film them picking up a random woman off the street and then having a rather jolly time together!&nbsp; Guess what they're going to do with the glasses?&nbsp; Do you think things won't go according to plan?&nbsp; Do you think that despite the implication being this is meant to suggest objectifying women isn't a good thing it won't in fact do anything of the kind?&nbsp; Do you think the pay off despite everything being wrong will be worth it, rather than a mess of CGI and shaky cam?&nbsp; Does the director think everyone in the audience won't be asking themselves WHY HASN'T HE TAKEN THE GODDAMN GLASSES OFF?<br /><br />Next up is director Ti West, known for 2009's <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1172994/?ref_=nv_sr_1">House of the Devil</a>, with "Second Honeymoon".&nbsp; His segment ends with one of the goons asking, "what the fuck was that?".&nbsp; My sentiments exactly.&nbsp; The one thing that can be said in its favour is that if you were to find a tape with a real murder filmed on it, it would probably make as little sense as his section does.&nbsp; Couple on a road trip, film themselves as they go along, only there's someone letting themselves into their hotel room who picks the camera up and records them as they sleep, only THEY USE A LIGHT AND YET IT SOMEHOW DOESN'T WAKE THE COUPLE UP.&nbsp; Nor does the couple notice anything amiss, apart from some money having gone missing.&nbsp; It's dreadful.<br /><br />We then have Glenn McQuaid's "Tuesday the 17th", which as you would expect from the title is sort of playing with genre conventions except not really.&nbsp; Best of the bunch which is saying very little is Joe Swanberg's The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger, which consists of Skype chats between a couple living apart, with the Emily of the title convinced her apartment is haunted.&nbsp; It is, and yet it isn't.&nbsp; In fact it's something far worse.&nbsp; It's not in the slightest bit scary, but it does switch things up after what's gone before, although again there's some unnecessary leeriness.&nbsp; Last is "10/31/98", and we are back once again into everything that is wrong with the found footage genre.&nbsp; Our gang of slightly older bros don't think to call the police and instead steam in to save the victim of some crazies at a house where they thought there was a Halloween party, with the expected consequences.<br /><br />The problem with "found footage" is it asks you to suspend your disbelief twice over.&nbsp; While you can accept the horror genre's tropes of the victims of the masked assailant being stupid and either unable/unwilling to call for help, to do so when you're also being asked to believe that what you're viewing is a document of something that happened is a step too far.&nbsp; It can work only in certain specific circumstances, whether it be in the woods like Blair Witch Project, away from a phone signal, or in the depths of the rainforest <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078935/?ref_=nv_sr_1">as in Cannibal Holocaust</a>.&nbsp; That the high point of the genre is still the one that started it all rather suggests it's not going to be improved upon.&nbsp; Please filmmakers, for the sake of our sanity, give it a rest.&nbsp;</span>http://septicisle1.blogspot.com/2015/05/film-review-vhs.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (septicisle)2